Hello Amar,
thank you for the advice. We already use nl-cache option and a bunch of
other settings. At the moment we try the samba-vfs-glusterfs plugin to
access a gluster volume via samba. The performance increase now.
Additionally we are looking for some performance measurements to compare
with.
For Samba usecase, please make sure you have nl-cache (ie, 'negative-lookup
cache') enabled. We have seen some improvements from this value.
-Amar
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 8:23 PM David Spisla wrote:
> Dear Gluster Community,
>
> it is a known fact that Samba+Gluster has a bad smallfile
Dear Gluster Community,
it is a known fact that Samba+Gluster has a bad smallfile performance. We
now have some test measurements created by this setup: 2-Node-Cluster on
real hardware with Replica-2 Volume (just one subvolume), Gluster v.4.1.6,
Samba v4.7. Samba writes to Gluster via FUSE. Files
