also i think you should be able to get better performance if you use
vfs_glusterfs [1]. From what I understand it's similar to samba what
nfs-ganesha does for nfs, it uses the libgfapi directly rather than
sharing a fuse-mount
[1]
I forgot the link. Here it is:
https://github.com/gluster/glusterdocs/blob/9f2c979b50517b7cb7bf9fbcfccb033bc7bf5082/docs/Administrator%20Guide/Accessing%20Gluster%20from%20Windows.md
Am Fr., 5. Apr. 2019 um 13:57 Uhr schrieb David Spisla :
> Hello Anoop,
>
> it is a known issue that
Hello Anoop,
it is a known issue that Gluster+Samba has a poor performance especially
for small files.
May this manual can give you more inspiration how to setup your Gluster and
Samba environment.
Regards
David Spisla
Am Fr., 5. Apr. 2019 um 11:28 Uhr schrieb Anoop C S :
> On Fri, 2019-04-05
On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 09:28 +0200, Benedikt Kaleß wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm running gluster version 5.5-1 and I'm dealing with a slow
> performance together with samba and start to analyze the issue.
>
> I want to set the options for samba. But when I try
>
> gluster volume set group
Hi everyone,
I'm running gluster version 5.5-1 and I'm dealing with a slow
performance together with samba and start to analyze the issue.
I want to set the options for samba. But when I try
gluster volume set group samba
I get the following error message:
Unable to open file
Hi folks,
We found that samba performance downgrade a lot with glusterfs backend. volume
info as followed,
Volume Name: vol1
Type: Distribute
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 1
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: pana53:/data/
Options Reconfigured:
auth.allow: 192.168.*
features.quota: on
