Re: [Gluster-users] What is the corresponding op-version for a glusterfs release?

2016-04-22 Thread Atin Mukherjee
-Atin Sent from one plus one On 22-Apr-2016 8:04 pm, "Dj Merrill" wrote: > > On 04/20/2016 07:32 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > Unfortunately there is no such document. But I can take you through > > couple of code files [1] [2] where the first one defines all the volume > >

Re: [Gluster-users] What is the corresponding op-version for a glusterfs release?

2016-04-22 Thread Dj Merrill
On 04/20/2016 07:32 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > Unfortunately there is no such document. But I can take you through > couple of code files [1] [2] where the first one defines all the volume > tunables and their respective supported op-version where the later has > the exact number of all those

Re: [Gluster-users] What is the corresponding op-version for a glusterfs release?

2016-04-20 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On 04/20/2016 10:31 PM, Dj Merrill wrote: > On 04/20/2016 12:06 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >>> Curious, is there any reason why this isn't automatically updated when >>> managing the updates with "yum update"? >> This is still manual as we want to give users choose whether they want >> to use a

Re: [Gluster-users] What is the corresponding op-version for a glusterfs release?

2016-04-20 Thread Dj Merrill
On 04/20/2016 12:06 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> Curious, is there any reason why this isn't automatically updated when >> managing the updates with "yum update"? > This is still manual as we want to give users choose whether they want > to use a new feature or not. If they want, then a manual

Re: [Gluster-users] What is the corresponding op-version for a glusterfs release?

2016-04-20 Thread Atin Mukherjee
-Atin Sent from one plus one On 20-Apr-2016 9:22 pm, "Dj Merrill" wrote: > > On 04/19/2016 05:42 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > >> After a brief search, I discovered the following solution for RHGS: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2050753 It suggests updating the op-version of

Re: [Gluster-users] What is the corresponding op-version for a glusterfs release?

2016-04-20 Thread Dj Merrill
On 04/19/2016 05:42 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> After a brief search, I discovered the following solution for RHGS: >> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2050753 It suggests updating the >> op-version of the cluster after the upgrade. There isn't any evidence of >> this procedure in the

Re: [Gluster-users] What is the corresponding op-version for a glusterfs release?

2016-04-19 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On 04/19/2016 02:56 PM, Stefano Stagnaro wrote: > After upgrading my cluster from 3.7.5 to 3.7.9 I got the following error when > I tried to enable quotas: > > "quota command failed : Volume quota failed. The cluster is operating at > version 30702. Quota command enable is unavailable in this

[Gluster-users] What is the corresponding op-version for a glusterfs release?

2016-04-19 Thread Stefano Stagnaro
After upgrading my cluster from 3.7.5 to 3.7.9 I got the following error when I tried to enable quotas: "quota command failed : Volume quota failed. The cluster is operating at version 30702. Quota command enable is unavailable in this version." After a brief search, I discovered the following