Re: [Gluster-users] Adding arbiter on a large existing replica 2 set

uster.org%3e>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Adding arbiter on a large existing replica 2 set Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 21:04:50 +0300 Hi Thorgeir, Did you try adding an arbiter with SSD brick/bricks ? SSD/NVMe is the best type of storage for an arbiter - yes , it's more expensive but you wi

[Gluster-users] Adding arbiter on a large existing replica 2 set

Hi, We have an old Gluster cluster setup, running a replica 2 across two datacenters, and currently on version 4.1.5 I need to add an arbiter to this setup, but I'm concerned about the performance impact of this on the volumes. I recently set up a new cluster, for a different purpose, and

Re: [Gluster-users] adding arbiter

Il 04/04/2017 17:35, Krutika Dhananjay ha scritto: > You mean when converting a replica 2 volume to a replica 3 volume with > arbiter? > No, you don't need to do rebalance. > > What you will need to do instead is monitor heal-info output to ensure > the directory tree is sync'd to the arbiter

Re: [Gluster-users] adding arbiter

You mean when converting a replica 2 volume to a replica 3 volume with arbiter? No, you don't need to do rebalance. What you will need to do instead is monitor heal-info output to ensure the directory tree is sync'd to the arbiter brick. Please refer to http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14502/2 for

Re: [Gluster-users] adding arbiter

Il 04/04/2017 16:16, Krutika Dhananjay ha scritto: > So the corruption bug is seen iff your vms are online while fix-layout > and/or rebalance is going on. > Does that answer your question? > > The same issue has now been root-caused and there will be a fix for it > soon by Raghavendra G. Yes it

Re: [Gluster-users] adding arbiter

So the corruption bug is seen iff your vms are online while fix-layout and/or rebalance is going on. Does that answer your question? The same issue has now been root-caused and there will be a fix for it soon by Raghavendra G. -Krutika On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Alessandro Briosi

Re: [Gluster-users] adding arbiter

Il 01/04/2017 04:22, Gambit15 ha scritto: > As I understand it, only new files will be sharded, but simply > renaming or moving them may be enough in that case. > > I'm interested in the arbiter/sharding bug you've mentioned. Could you > provide any more details or a link? > I think it is

Re: [Gluster-users] adding arbiter

As I understand it, only new files will be sharded, but simply renaming or moving them may be enough in that case. I'm interested in the arbiter/sharding bug you've mentioned. Could you provide any more details or a link? Cheers, D On 30 March 2017 at 20:25, Laura Bailey

Re: [Gluster-users] adding arbiter

I can't answer all of these, but I think the only way to share existing files is to create a new volume with sharding enabled and copy the files over into it. Cheers, Laura B On Friday, March 31, 2017, Alessandro Briosi wrote: > Hi I need some advice. > > I'm currently on

[Gluster-users] adding arbiter

Hi I need some advice. I'm currently on 3.8.10 and would like to know the following: 1. If I add an arbiter to an existing volume should I also run a rebalance? 2. If I had sharding enabled would adding the arbiter trigger the corruption bug? 3. What's the procedure to enable sharding on an