On 06/03/2010 12:48 PM, Hassan Jafri wrote:
I have a 2 node mirrored setup for gluster. I am trying to use booster for
my file I/O. For testing, I just tried writing a 1M file as follows:
node041 $ export GLUSTERFS_BOOSTER_FSTAB=/etc/glusterfs/booster.fstab
node041 $
Hi Liam,
Can you send glusterfs server logs?
regards,
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Liam Slusser lslus...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe i posted this here before but never got any replies. I'm in
the middle of upgrading to Gluster 2.0.9 and would like to move away
from having to use fuse to
2010/1/12 Raghavendra G raghavendra...@gmail.com
Hi Liam,
Can you send glusterfs server logs?
regards,
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Liam Slusser lslus...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe i posted this here before but never got any replies. I'm in
the middle of upgrading to Gluster 2.0.9
Logs are below. I also noticed this while trying to debug this
issue...Notice the md5sum do not match up below?
On the fuse mounted system:
[r...@server test]# ls -al test.mp3
-rw-r--r-- 1 user group 3692251 Aug 27 2007 test.mp3
[r...@server test]# md5sum test.mp3
I was able to install lighttpd 1.4.25 and it appears to work just fine
with glusterfs-booster.so. So I think its an issue with Apache 2.2.14
(the newest version available). I suppose i can try an older version
of Apache and see if i have better luck (say 2.0)...
liam
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at
Hi,
Can you send the glusterfs server logs? The logs you've sent are of booster
(which is glusterfs client). Looking at the configuration, there is a
protocol/client in configuration and hence you need a glusterfs server
running.
We'll work on issue of md5sums being different.
regards,
On Tue,
Oh, sorry, here are the glusterfsd server logs - this is all it logged
from the Apache startup and wget.
server1:
[2010-01-11 22:09:39] N [server-protocol.c:7056:mop_setvolume] server:
accepted client from 192.168.12.72:1014
[2010-01-11 22:09:39] N [server-protocol.c:7056:mop_setvolume] server:
I'm having a strange booster+apache issue. I am unable to get apache
to download any of the files through booster. I get a 403 (Forbidden)
on any file. If I enabled directory indexes i can get directory
listings but still a 403 on any file. I can view/list just files just
fine by using
Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
Hello all,
we would like to try a simple booster configuration. Reading the
docs we found this:
(http://www.gluster.com/community/documentation/index.php/Booster_Configuration_Reference_Page)
Still, applications that need to use the old approach, can do so
Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:40:03 +0530 Shehjar Tikoo
shehj...@gluster.com wrote:
We only tried to run some bash scripts with preloaded
booster...
Do you mean the scripts contained commands with LD_PRELOADed
booster? Or were you trying to run bash with LD_PRELOADed
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:03:05 +0530
Shehjar Tikoo shehj...@gluster.com wrote:
Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:40:03 +0530 Shehjar Tikoo
shehj...@gluster.com wrote:
We only tried to run some bash scripts with preloaded
booster...
Do you mean the scripts
2. running bash wasnt a very useful scenario when the LD_PRELOAD
variable can be added for the bash environment as a whole. For eg.
if you just do export LD_PRELOAD=blah on the command line, you can
actually have every program started from that shell use booster.
-Shehjar
There is a
On 09/14/2009 06:31 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
2. running bash wasnt a very useful scenario when the LD_PRELOAD
variable can be added for the bash environment as a whole. For eg.
if you just do export LD_PRELOAD=blah on the command line, you can
actually have every program started from
On 09/14/2009 01:21 PM, David Saez Padros wrote:
Hi
Is there any problem in having both the gluster file system
mounted in the traditional way and booster using the same
'mount point' ?
Due to some system calls not being handling by Gluster - I think I would
suggest it.
It's not perfect -
Hi
Is there any problem in having both the gluster file system
mounted in the traditional way and booster using the same
'mount point' ?
Due to some system calls not being handling by Gluster - I think I would
suggest it.
It's not perfect - but at least any calls that fall through will
It's not perfect - but at least any calls that fall through will still be
handled properly. For example, if an application calls fopen(), which is not
on the GlusterFS list of overridden system calls the last time I checked,
then at least the fopen() will be intercepted by FUSE rather than
On 9/14/09, Stephan von Krawczynski sk...@ithnet.com wrote:
2. running bash wasnt a very useful scenario when the LD_PRELOAD
variable can be added for the bash environment as a whole. For eg.
if you just do export LD_PRELOAD=blah on the command line, you can
actually have every
On 09/14/2009 03:09 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
It's not perfect - but at least any calls that fall through will still be
handled properly. For example, if an application calls fopen(), which is not
on the GlusterFS list of overridden system calls the last time I checked,
then at least the fopen()
Tim Runion - System Administrator wrote:
I also wanted to add to this post about booster. I have tried
booster with apache 2.2
Which GlusterFS release are you using?
Which tool or test against apache results in a core dump?
-Shehjar
Liam Slusser wrote:
I've been playing with booster unfs and found that i cannot get it to work
with a gluster config that uses cluster/distribute. I am using Gluster
2.0.3...
Thanks. I've seen the stale handle errors while using both
replicate and distribute. The fixes are in the repo but
not
20 matches
Mail list logo
