Wei Dong wrote:
By using booster, I actually avoid being root on the client side.
It would be perfect if the servers can also be run by regular
users, even if that means that some features have to be deleted.
Can someone explain a little bit why the server side must be run by
root?
There ar
Yes, they are all using booster without actually mounting the directory
on the client side.
- Wei
Anand Avati wrote:
On 9/13/09, Wei Dong wrote:
OK, so the previous good results are indeed too good to be true. Here's a
more reasonable evaluation
http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~wdong/gluster
On 9/13/09, Wei Dong wrote:
> OK, so the previous good results are indeed too good to be true. Here's a
> more reasonable evaluation
> http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~wdong/gluster/large.gif where
> I enlarged the number of images created by 10x so everything no longer fit
> in main memory. Still
OK, so the previous good results are indeed too good to be true. Here's
a more reasonable evaluation
http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~wdong/gluster/large.gif where I enlarged
the number of images created by 10x so everything no longer fit in main
memory. Still look good to me.
Wei Dong wrot
By using booster, I actually avoid being root on the client side. It
would be perfect if the servers can also be run by regular users, even
if that means that some features have to be deleted. Can someone
explain a little bit why the server side must be run by root?
I know that I should not
I think it is fuse that causes the slowness. I ran all experiments with
booster enabled and here's the new figure:
http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~wdong/gluster/summary-booster.gif . The
numbers are MUCH better than NFS in most cases except for the local
setting, which is not practically intere
