Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with add-brick

2016-10-25 Thread Raghavendra Talur
Top posting because there are multiple questions 1. Atin, it is expected to fail if you don't have RDMA device or if it is not configured. 2. Rafi and Dennis, I was not able to determine from logs if it really is a RDMA bug. The brick logs suggest that brick started and even accepted

Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with add-brick

2016-09-30 Thread Dennis Michael
Are there any workarounds to this? RDMA is configured on my servers. Dennis On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > Dennis, > > Thanks for sharing the logs. > > It seems like a volume configured created with tcp,rdma transport fails to > start (atleast in

Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with add-brick

2016-09-30 Thread Mohammed Rafi K C
It seems like an actual bug, if youcan file a bug in bugzilla, that would be great. At least I don't see workaround for this issue, may be till the next update is available with fix, you can use either rdma alone or tcp alone volume. Let me know whether this is acceptable, if so I can give you

Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with add-brick

2016-09-30 Thread Atin Mukherjee
Dennis, Thanks for sharing the logs. It seems like a volume configured created with tcp,rdma transport fails to start (atleast in my local set up). The issue here is although the brick process comes up, but glusterd receives a non zero ret code from the runner interface which spawns the brick

Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with add-brick

2016-09-30 Thread Mohammed Rafi K C
On 09/30/2016 02:35 AM, Dennis Michael wrote: > > Are there any workarounds to this? RDMA is configured on my servers. By this, I assume your rdma setup/configuration over IPoIB is working fine. Can you tell us what machine you are using and whether SELinux is configured on the machine or

Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with add-brick

2016-09-27 Thread Atin Mukherjee
Dennis, It seems like that add-brick has definitely failed and the entry is not committed into glusterd store. volume status and volume info commands are referring the in-memory data for fs4 (which exist) but post a restart they are no longer available. Could you run glusterd with debug log

Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with add-brick

2016-09-27 Thread Ravishankar N
On 09/27/2016 09:06 PM, Dennis Michael wrote: Yes, the brick log /var/log/glusterfs/bricks/data-brick.log is created on fs4, and the snippets showing the errors were from that log. Unless I'm missing something, the snippet below is from glusterd's log and not the brick's as is evident from

Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with add-brick

2016-09-27 Thread Dennis Michael
Yes, the brick log /var/log/glusterfs/bricks/data-brick.log is created on fs4, and the snippets showing the errors were from that log. Dennis On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Ravishankar N wrote: > On 09/27/2016 05:25 AM, Dennis Michael wrote: > >> [2016-09-26

Re: [Gluster-users] Problem with add-brick

2016-09-26 Thread Ravishankar N
On 09/27/2016 05:25 AM, Dennis Michael wrote: [2016-09-26 22:44:39.254921] E [MSGID: 106005] [glusterd-utils.c:4771:glusterd_brick_start] 0-management: Unable to start brick fs4:/data/brick [2016-09-26 22:44:39.254949] E [MSGID: 106074] [glusterd-brick-ops.c:2372:glusterd_op_add_brick]