Re: [Gluster-users] nfs mounting and copying files [SOLVED]

Hi Soumya Koduri and all, To start with, could you please check the logs '/var/log/glusterfs/nfs.log' and brick logs for any errors/warnings. Thanks, Soumya As that cluster is needed quickly I decided to stop the use of NFS for the local mount of the volume. I delete the volume, reformat

[Gluster-users] restoring brick on new server failes on glusterfs

I am triying to attach a brick from another server to a local gluster development server. Therfore I have done a dd from a snapshot on production and a dd on the lvm volume on development. Then I deleted the .glusterfs folder on root. Unfortunatelly forming a new brick failed nevertheless with

Re: [Gluster-users] What Gluster versions would you like to see in the CentOS Storage SIG?

On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 10:18 +0100, Niels de Vos wrote: > Please speak up and let us know what versions you depend on for next few > months. You can reply to this email to the list (note that it is > x-posted, one mailinglist is sufficient for your reply), directly to me > or over IRC in

Re: [Gluster-users] restoring brick on new server failes on glusterfs

On 11/20/2015 01:30 AM, Merlin Morgenstern wrote: > I am triying to attach a brick from another server to a local gluster > development server. Therfore I have done a dd from a snapshot on > production and a dd on the lvm volume on development. Then I deleted the > .glusterfs folder on root. >

Re: [Gluster-users] What Gluster versions would you like to see in the CentOS Storage SIG?

I’ve got 3.6 & 3.7 systems on Cent 7, migrating into 3.7 for everything these days… > On Nov 19, 2015, at 7:57 PM, Kingsley wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 10:18 +0100, Niels de Vos wrote: >> Please speak up and let us know what versions you depend on for next

Re: [Gluster-users] File Corruption with shards - 100% reproducable

On 19/11/15 14:49, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: I wanted to ask you one more thing: specifically in VM workload with sharding, do you run into consistency issues with strict-write-ordering being off? I remember suggesting that this option be enabled. But that was for plain dd on the mountpoint

Re: [Gluster-users] File Corruption with shards - 100% reproducable

On 20/11/15 15:15, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: One caveat - I started testing with 3.7.5, then upgraded to 3.7.6, but didn't upgrade the op-version (always forget that). Once I set the op version to 3.7.6 sharded volumes started reporting correct file sizes (for new files) even with