I believe some of the staff tested gfapi back in the 3.4 days and found
that at least that version didn't make a perceptible difference though
it tested about 10% faster. We stayed with Fuse because at that time
gfapi was still newish and we had used fuse for quite awhile and
understood it.
On 05/17/2016 01:59 PM, CHEVALIER Pierre wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have found a similar question in the ML but didn't find the answer I
> wanted.
> My situation is the following :
> We have 2 existing data storage unit with 72TB each, with 10TB left.
> Currently these storage unit are synced
Hi,
Please find the minutes of today's Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting
below. Thanks to everyone who have attended the meeting.
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-05-17/gluster_bug_triage.2016-05-17-12.01.html
Minutes (text):
Hi everyone,
I have found a similar question in the ML but didn't find the answer I
wanted.
My situation is the following :
We have 2 existing data storage unit with 72TB each, with 10TB left.
Currently these storage unit are synced using rsync periodically. We
want to tansform these 2
Hmm in that case, could you do the following:
If you could recreate this issue again, could you record the extended
attributes associated with
the shards that you see being listed against the replaced-brick in
heal-info.
For example, assuming you replaced the brick on vng, once heal kicks in,
On 17/05/2016 7:56 PM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
Would you know where the logs of individual vms are with proxmox?
No i don't I'm afraid. Would they be a function of gluster or qemu?
--
Lindsay Mathieson
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Would you know where the logs of individual vms are with proxmox?
In those, do you see any libgfapi/gluster log messages?
-Krutika
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Lindsay Mathieson <
lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 17 May 2016 at 10:02, WK wrote:
> > That being