Awesome. Thanks for the logs. Will take a look.
-Krutika
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Lindsay Mathieson <
lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20/10/2016 9:13 PM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
>
>> It would be awesome if you could tell us whether you
>> see the issue with FUSE as well, while
On 20/10/2016 9:13 PM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
It would be awesome if you could tell us whether you
see the issue with FUSE as well, while we get around
to setting up the environment and running the test ourselves.
I just managed to replicate the exact same error using the fuse mount
--
Linds
On 20/10/2016 8:43 AM, Joe Julian wrote:
Is there a bug open with the client and server logs attached? I would
take a stab at reproducing as well, but I want to make sure I'm
comparing apples to apples.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387878
--
Lindsay Mathieson
- Original Message -
> From: "Hari Gowtham"
> To: "Atin Mukherjee"
> Cc: "gluster-users" , "gluster-devel"
>
> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 3:52:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] New commands for supporting add/remove brick and
> rebalance on tiered volume
>
> Hi,
>
> Currentl
On Saturday 22 October 2016, mabi wrote:
> Thanks for the info, so I will set it to 30712. Do I need to restart
> anything after that or does it work instantly ?
>
Nothing required.
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Setting op-version after upgrade
> Local T
Thanks for the info, so I will set it to 30712. Do I need to restart anything
after that or does it work instantly ?
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Setting op-version after upgrade
Local Time: October 22, 2016 3:02 PM
UTC Time: October 22, 2016 1:02 PM
From: olek
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko <
oleksa...@natalenko.name> wrote:
> IIRC, latest opversion is 30712.
>
Yes, it is 30712. Samikshan is working on a patch [1] to avoid this kind of
confusion/pain for an user and we expect this to land in 3.10.
[1] http://review.gluster.org/#/
IIRC, latest opversion is 30712.
On October 22, 2016 1:38:44 PM GMT+02:00, mabi wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I just upgraded from GlusterFS 3.7.12 to 3.7.16 and checked the
>op-version for all my volumes and found out that I am still using
>op-version 30706 as you can see below:
>
>Option Value
>--
2016-10-22 14:14 GMT+02:00 Kevin Lemonnier :
> Never tried it, but I always heard you should never do that. Having
> to processes accessing the same file won't end up well I think.
I don't want to create a master/master setup
One maildir is "running" only on one dovecot server.
But multiple doveco
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
> I would like to test Gluster for Maildir hosting.
> Any suggestions about this? Anyone using gluster for maildir hosting
> in production?
>
Never tried it, but I always heard you should never do that. Having
to processes acc
I would like to test Gluster for Maildir hosting.
Any suggestions about this? Anyone using gluster for maildir hosting
in production?
Should I use FUSE or NFS-Ganesha? What If I create a huge file
exported as iSCSI and mounted on each Dovecot server accessing the
Maildir?
I'm looking for some adv
Hello,
I just upgraded from GlusterFS 3.7.12 to 3.7.16 and checked the op-version for
all my volumes and found out that I am still using op-version 30706 as you can
see below:
Option Value
-- -
cluster.op-version 30706
My question here is: should I manually set the op-version for all m
On 22/10/2016 3:03 AM, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
Just based on a Google search, I’d say yes.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/samba#As_mount_entry
We use the FUSE mounts and with those it works well.
Thanks, looks rather better than my current setup
--
Lindsay Mathieson
_
13 matches
Mail list logo
