Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Don't allow data loss via add-brick (was Re: Add single server)

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:59 PM, wrote: > > Fix is up @ https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17160/ . The only thing which > > we'd need to decide (and are debating on) is that should we bypass this > > validation with rebalance start force or not. What do others think? > > I

Re: [Gluster-users] severe security vulnerability in glusterfs with remote-hosts option

I should amend that. On May 3, 2017 8:18:39 PM PDT, Vijay Bellur wrote: >On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Joseph Lorenzini >wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I came across this blog entry. It seems that there's an undocumented >> command line option that allows

Re: [Gluster-users] severe security vulnerability in glusterfs with remote-hosts option

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Joseph Lorenzini wrote: > Hi all, > > I came across this blog entry. It seems that there's an undocumented > command line option that allows someone to execute a gluster cli command on > a remote host. > >

[Gluster-users] postgresql is unable to create a table in gluster volume

Hi Team, We’ve been intermittently seeing issues where postgresql is unable to create a table, or some info is missing. Postgresql logs the following error: ERROR:  unexpected data beyond EOF in block 53 of relation base/16384/12009HINT:  This has been seen to occur with buggy kernels; consider

Re: [Gluster-users] Elasticsearch facing CorruptIndexException exception with GlusterFs 3.10.1

I think there is still some pending stuffs in some of the gluster perf xlators to make that work complete. Cced the relevant folks for more information. Can you please turn off all the perf xlator options as a work around to move forward? On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Abhijit Paul

[Gluster-users] Elasticsearch facing CorruptIndexException exception with GlusterFs 3.10.1

Dear folks, I setup Glusterfs(3.10.1) NFS type as persistence volume for Elasticsearch(5.1.2) but currently facing issue with *"CorruptIndexException" *with Elasticseach logs and due to that index health trued RED in Elasticsearch. Later found that there was an issue with gluster < 3.10 (

Re: [Gluster-users] Monitoring GlusterFS

There are no Ubuntu specific instructions or packaged nagios plugins that I'm aware of. You can you whatever tool you'd like for monitoring. These repos are for gluster/nagios: https://github.com/gluster/nagios-plugins-gluster https://github.com/gluster/gluster-nagios-common

[Gluster-users] Gluster long healing process

Hi, I have a 4 node Gluster volume, each has 24 SSD brick running Gluster 3.8.10 (two volumes), i updated one of the nodes to 3.8.11 and rebooted the node, after it came back online the healing process started and it never ended. It has been 24 hours and the healing is still going, gluster

[Gluster-users] Monitoring GlusterFS

Hello, So I have GlusterFS installed in 3 machines, 2 of the machines are glusterfs-server and the other one it´s glusterfs-client. They replication is working fine. But now I want to monitoring the nodes server in nagios, but i installed glusterfs on ubuntu machines, are some way to do that or

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster and NFS-Ganesha - cluster is down after reboot

On 05/03/2017 03:02 PM, Mahdi Adnan wrote: Hi, Same here, when i reboot the node i have to manually execute "pcs cluster start gluster01" and pcsd already enabled and started. Gluster 3.8.11 Centos 7.3 latest Installed using CentOS Storage SIG repository Could you please check too if

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster and NFS-Ganesha - cluster is down after reboot

On 05/03/2017 02:39 PM, Adam Ru wrote: Hi Soumya, thank you very much for your reply. I enabled pcsd during setup and after reboot during troubleshooting I manually started it and checked resources (pcs status). They were not running. I didn’t find what was wrong but I’m going to try it

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Don't allow data loss via add-brick (was Re: Add single server)

> Fix is up @ https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17160/ . The only thing which > we'd need to decide (and are debating on) is that should we bypass this > validation with rebalance start force or not. What do others think? I think that if you are specifying force, that's your business. Maybe still

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Don't allow data loss via add-brick (was Re: Add single server)

2017-05-03 14:22 GMT+02:00 Atin Mukherjee : > Fix is up @ https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17160/ . The only thing which > we'd need to decide (and are debating on) is that should we bypass this > validation with rebalance start force or not. What do others think? This is a

[Gluster-users] severe security vulnerability in glusterfs with remote-hosts option

Hi all, I came across this blog entry. It seems that there's an undocumented command line option that allows someone to execute a gluster cli command on a remote host. https://joejulian.name/blog/one-more-reason-that-glusterfs-should-not-be-used-as-a-saas-offering/ I am on gluster 3.9 and the

Re: [Gluster-users] Release 3.10.2: Scheduled for the 30th of April

I had previously announced that we would be releasing 3.10.2 today. This is to update the 3.10.2 release is now delayed. We are waiting for a bug[1] to be fixed. If you are waiting for 3.10.2 release for a particular bug fix, please let us know. I will update with expected release date by

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.11: Has been Branched (and pending feature notes)

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Shyam wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Release 3.11 for gluster has been branched [1] and tagged [2]. >> >> We have ~4weeks to release of 3.11, and a week to

[Gluster-users] Enabling shard on EC

Hi, Are there any known negatives of enabling shard on EC. Is this a recommended configuration?. Thanks and Regards, Ram ***Legal Disclaimer*** "This communication may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the

[Gluster-users] Poor read performance and other funny performance results

Hi, I'm trying to set up a very simple glusterfs based system, but I'm getting some strange performance numbers. To keep the test simple I've: * Set up a volume on a single server * Mounted the volume only via localhost * Kept the files small (1-10G) so they always fit in page cache. I hope this

Re: [Gluster-users] Replica 2 cluster not replicating

Some additional info: I read somewhere that there has been a problem when the directory structures are too deep. On my file servers there is a depth of 9-10 directories, is this still a problem? The error I find in the error log is: performing entry selfheal on