Re: [Gluster-users] brick is down but gluster volume status says it's fine

It looks like this is to do with the stale port issue. I think it's pretty clear from the below that the digitalcorpora brick process is shown by volume status as having the same TCP port as the public volume brick on gluster-2, 49156. But is actually listening on 49154. So although the brick

Re: [Gluster-users] brick is down but gluster volume status says it's fine

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Alastair Neil wrote: > gluster version 3.10.6, replica 3 volume, daemon is present but does not > appear to be functioning > > peculiar behaviour. If I kill the glusterfs brick daemon and restart > glusterd then the brick becomes

[Gluster-users] brick is down but gluster volume status says it's fine

gluster version 3.10.6, replica 3 volume, daemon is present but does not appear to be functioning peculiar behaviour. If I kill the glusterfs brick daemon and restart glusterd then the brick becomes available - but one of my other volumes bricks on the same server goes down in the same way it's

Re: [Gluster-users] active-active georeplication?

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:04 AM, atris adam wrote: > thx for reply, that was so much interesting to me. > How can I get these news about glusterfs new features? > The release notes generally contain information about new features. You can also lookup the github projects

Re: [Gluster-users] gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal

I have 14,734 GFIDS that are different. All the different ones are only on the brick that was live during the outage and concurrent file copy- in. The brick that was down at that time has no GFIDs that are not also on the up brick. As the bricks are 10TB, the find is going to be a long running

Re: [Gluster-users] active-active georeplication?

thx for reply, that was so much interesting to me. How can I get these news about glusterfs new features? On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > Halo replication [1] could be of interest here. This functionality is > available since 3.11 and the current

Re: [Gluster-users] active-active georeplication?

Halo replication [1] could be of interest here. This functionality is available since 3.11 and the current plan is to have it fully supported in a 4.x release. Note that Halo replication is built on existing synchronous replication in Gluster and differs from the current geo-replication

Re: [Gluster-users] trying to add a 3rd peer

I always used IP addresses instead of names when I added a peer. In the gluster peer status, I do see IP: [root@DC-MTL-NAS-01 ~]# gluster peer status Number of Peers: 2 Hostname: XXX.XXX.XXX.12 Uuid: ec1e10c1-0e38-4d2a-ab51-50fb0c67b6ee State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) Hostname:

Re: [Gluster-users] create volume in two different Data Centers

On 24/10/17 13:01, Alessandro Briosi wrote: > I would set up a VPN (tinc could work well). I, too, would recommend to try tinc for this, it can automatically route traffic of nodes that don't have direct access to other nodes via those nodes that do. I have a publicly available setup of Gluster

Re: [Gluster-users] create volume in two different Data Centers

Il 24/10/2017 12:45, atris adam ha scritto: > thanks for answering. But I have to setup and test it myself and > record the result. Can you guide me a little more. The problem is, one > valid ip for each data centers exist, and each data centers have 3 > servers. How should I config the network in

Re: [Gluster-users] create volume in two different Data Centers

thanks for answering. But I have to setup and test it myself and record the result. Can you guide me a little more. The problem is, one valid ip for each data centers exist, and each data centers have 3 servers. How should I config the network in which the server bricks see each other to create a

Re: [Gluster-users] create volume in two different Data Centers

Hi, You can, but unless the two datacenters are very close, it'll be slow as hell. I tried it myself and even a 10ms ping between the bricks is horrible. On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 01:42:49PM +0330, atris adam wrote: > Hi > > I have two data centers, each of them have 3 servers. This two data

[Gluster-users] create volume in two different Data Centers

Hi I have two data centers, each of them have 3 servers. This two data centers can see each other over the internet. I want to create a distributed glusterfs volume with these 6 servers, but I have only one valid ip in each data center. Is it possible to create a glusterfs volume?Can anyone guide

Re: [Gluster-users] active-active georeplication?

Hi, No, gluster doesn't support active-active geo-replication. It's not planned in near future. We will let you know when it's planned. Thanks, Kotresh HR On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:19 AM, atris adam wrote: > hi everybody, > > Have glusterfs released a feature named

Re: [Gluster-users] gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal

Hi Jim, Can you check whether the same hardlinks are present on both the bricks & both of them have the link count 2? If the link count is 2 then "find -samefile //" should give you the file path. Regards, Karthik On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Jim Kinney wrote: > I'm

Re: [Gluster-users] trying to add a 3rd peer

Are you shure about possibility to resolve all node names on all other nodes? You need to use names used previously in Gluster - check their by ‚gluster peer status’ or ‚gluster pool list’. Regards, Bartosz > Wiadomość napisana przez Ludwig Gamache w dniu > 24.10.2017,