Re: [Gluster-users] Bug 1442983 on 3.10.11 Unable to acquire lock for gluster volume leading to 'another transaction in progress' error

The fix is already available from glusterfs-3.12.3 onwards. Please refer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503239 . On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Paolo Margara wrote: > Hi, > > this patch it's already available in the community version of gluster > 3.12?

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)

Hi Tom, Thanks for your reply. 1. Yes XFS is on a LUKs LV (see below). 2. Yes, I prefer FIO but each Gluster host gets between 50-100K 4K random IOP/s both write and read to disk. 3. Yes, we actually use 2x 10Gbit DACs in LACP, but we get full 10Gbit speeds (and very low latency thanks to the

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)

On 3/18/2018 6:13 PM, Sam McLeod wrote: Even your NFS transfers are 12.5 or so MB per second or less. 1) Did you use fdisk and LVM under that XFS filesystem? 2) Did you benchmark the XFS with something like bonnie++? (There's probably newer benchmark suites now.) 3) Did you benchmark your

[Gluster-users] Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)

Howdy all, We're experiencing terrible small file performance when copying or moving files on gluster clients. In the example below, Gluster is taking 6mins~ to copy 128MB / 21,000 files sideways on a client, doing the same thing on NFS (which I know is a totally different solution etc. etc.)

Re: [Gluster-users] How to sync content to a file through standard Java APIs

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 06:07:19PM +0100, Sven Ludwig wrote: > Hello, > > we have a Gluster FS mounted at some /mnt/... path on a Server. The > actual physical device behind this resides on some other Server. > > Now, the requirement is to write files to this Gluster FS Volume in a > durable