[Gluster-users] how to get the true used capacity of the volume

I create a volume，and mounted it, and use df command to view the volume Available and used . After some testing， I think the used information displayed by df is the sum of the capacities of the disks on which the brick is located. Not the sum of the used of the brick directory. （I know the

Re: [Gluster-users] Release 3.12.8: Scheduled for the 12th of April

Thank you Ravi for your comments. I do understand that it might not be very wise to risk any mistakes by rushing this fix into 3.12.8. In that case I will be more patient and wait for 3.12.9 next month. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On April 11, 2018 5:09 PM, Ravishankar N

[Gluster-users] Unreasonably poor performance of replicated volumes

Hello everybody! I have 3 gluster servers (*gluster 3.12.6, Centos 7.2*; those are actually virtual machines located on 3 separate physical XenServer7.1 servers) They are all connected via infiniband network. Iperf3 shows around *23 Gbit/s network bandwidth *between each 2 of them. Each server

[Gluster-users] Minutes from today's community meeting (11 April 2018)

Thanks to all who attended! Joe Julian to host our next one at 25 April, 15:00 UTC. https://bit.ly/gluster-community-meetings has our agenda, feel free to add topics! === #gluster-meeting: Gluster Community Meeting - 11 April 2018

Re: [Gluster-users] volume start: gv01: failed: Quorum not met. Volume operation not allowed.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:35 AM, TomK wrote: > On 4/9/2018 2:45 AM, Alex K wrote: > Hey Alex, > > With two nodes, the setup works but both sides go down when one node is > missing. Still I set the below two params to none and that solved my issue: > > cluster.quorum-type:

Re: [Gluster-users] Release 3.12.8: Scheduled for the 12th of April

Mabi, It looks like one of the patches is not a straight forward cherry-pick to the 3.12 branch. Even though the conflict might be easy to resolve, I don't think it is a good idea to hurry it for tomorrow. We will definitely have it ready by the next minor release (or if by chance the

Re: [Gluster-users] Release 3.12.8: Scheduled for the 12th of April

Dear Jiffin, Would it be possible to have the following backported to 3.12: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482064 See my mail with subject "New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3" on the list earlier this week for more details. Thank you very much. Best regards, Mabi