Hi Filipe, I think it would probably be fine. The Red Hat Storage docs list the important thing being *5ms latency*, not link speed:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage/3.5/html/administration_guide/creating_arbitrated_replicated_volumes I haven't used an arbiter configuration yet (still stuck on distribute + replicate, not sure how to migrate). Let us know it goes. Regards, On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:59 PM Filipe Alvarez <filipealva...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi glusters, > > I'm close to deploy my first GlusterFS replica 3 arbiter 1 volume. > > Below I will describe my hardware / plans: > > Node1: two bricks, 2 x raid0 arrays 40gbe network > Node2: two bricks, 2 x raid0 arrays 40gbe network > Node3: Arbiter 1gbe network > > Between Node1 and Node2, I have a 40gbe network. > > But the arbiter has 1 gbe network. > > The question is, can arbiter run in a slow network ? It will affect the > general performance of volume? > > Thank you > > > ________ > > > > Community Meeting Calendar: > > Schedule - > Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC > Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > -- Alan Orth alan.o...@gmail.com https://picturingjordan.com https://englishbulgaria.net https://mjanja.ch
________ Community Meeting Calendar: Schedule - Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
