> On 23. Nov 2022, at 1.03, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
>
> To be honest, I have no idea how to answer that.
> Rocky guys do not want to duplicate the work, as we got GlusterFS in CentOS
> Stream (see https://forums.rockylinux.org/t/glusterfs-repos-location/6630/7 )
> while the CentOS guys
Hi!
I’m reviving an old thread, because my questions are related to the original
topic.
Are there any community packages available in any repository which are built
against the stable Alma or Rocky 9?
Is there a risk that Gluster packages built against CentOS 9 Stream would at
some point be
Hi!
Bumping an old thread, because there’s now activity around this bug. The github
issue is https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/2492
We just hit this bug after an update from GlusterFS 7.x to 9.4. We did not see
this in our test environment, so we did the update, but the bug is still
int or should we start preparing for an upgrade to
gluster 5.x?
Regards,
Ville-Pekka Vainio
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
was
mentioned in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671556
The bug report has some patches attached to it. Is there any hope for a 4.1.8
release with these fixes? https://www.gluster.org/release-schedule/ says 4.1.7
is an EOL version.
Best regards,
Ville-Pekka Vainio
> On 21 Oct 2016, at 19.52,
> wrote:
>
> Will that work for samba mounts? (cifs)
Just based on a Google search, I’d say yes.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/samba#As_mount_entry
We use the FUSE mounts and with those it works
Hi all,
On a system using systemd, you should also be able to use x-systemd.automount.
Just add 'noauto,x-systemd.automount’ to your fstab line and systemd should
mount the gluster volume for you when it’s accessed.
The ‘noauto’ option means that autofs won’t touch the mount and systemd will