Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr

2014-06-30 Thread Viktor Villafuerte
] on behalf of Martin Svec [martin.s...@zoner.cz] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:50 AM To: Justin Clift Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr Dne 24.6.2014 18:53, Justin Clift napsal(a): On 24/06/2014, at 5:35 PM, Martin Svec wrote

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr

2014-06-30 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
On 06/30/2014 02:41 AM, Viktor Villafuerte wrote: Thanks Ravishankar, I've patched and built the package already for RHEL6 and now RHEL5. Also while I was doing this I've noticed that bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073217 has not been included in 3.4.4 either. I've manually

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr

2014-06-30 Thread Justin Clift
On 30/06/2014, at 3:05 AM, Viktor Villafuerte wrote: On the same note, I've just got .src RPM for 3.4.4 and the patch is not there. From the email trail it seems that it's not officially backported to 3.4.4. It is present in the latest GIT release though.. Just to make sure I'm doing the

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr

2014-06-29 Thread Viktor Villafuerte
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr Dne 24.6.2014 18:53, Justin Clift napsal(a): On 24/06/2014, at 5:35 PM, Martin Svec wrote: snip Note that the patch is 11 months old. Why it isn't merged in 3.4 branch yet? Sounds like we just need

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr

2014-06-29 Thread Ravishankar N
, 2014 10:50 AM To: Justin Clift Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr Dne 24.6.2014 18:53, Justin Clift napsal(a): On 24/06/2014, at 5:35 PM, Martin Svec wrote: snip Note that the patch is 11 months old. Why it isn't merged in 3.4

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr

2014-06-25 Thread Justin Clift
On 25/06/2014, at 5:16 AM, Justin Clift wrote: On 24/06/2014, at 5:53 PM, Justin Clift wrote: On 24/06/2014, at 5:35 PM, Martin Svec wrote: snip Note that the patch is 11 months old. Why it isn't merged in 3.4 branch yet? Sounds like we just need to backport it to release-3.4 branch then.

[Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr

2014-06-24 Thread Martin Svec
Hello, while evaluating Gluster, I quickly noticed abnormal memory usage of glusterfs 3.4.4 FUSE client. According to valgrind, there's a memory leak in fuse_getxattr: ==31375== 1,145,000 (1,143,168 direct, 1,832 indirect) bytes in 624 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 348 of 354

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr

2014-06-24 Thread Justin Clift
On 24/06/2014, at 5:35 PM, Martin Svec wrote: snip Note that the patch is 11 months old. Why it isn't merged in 3.4 branch yet? Sounds like we just need to backport it to release-3.4 branch then. + Justin -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr

2014-06-24 Thread Martin Svec
Dne 24.6.2014 18:53, Justin Clift napsal(a): On 24/06/2014, at 5:35 PM, Martin Svec wrote: snip Note that the patch is 11 months old. Why it isn't merged in 3.4 branch yet? Sounds like we just need to backport it to release-3.4 branch then. Thank you, that would be fine :) It's surprising

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr

2014-06-24 Thread Peter Auyeung
24, 2014 10:50 AM To: Justin Clift Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr Dne 24.6.2014 18:53, Justin Clift napsal(a): On 24/06/2014, at 5:35 PM, Martin Svec wrote: snip Note that the patch is 11 months old. Why it isn't merged

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr

2014-06-24 Thread Justin Clift
On 24/06/2014, at 5:53 PM, Justin Clift wrote: On 24/06/2014, at 5:35 PM, Martin Svec wrote: snip Note that the patch is 11 months old. Why it isn't merged in 3.4 branch yet? Sounds like we just need to backport it to release-3.4 branch then. Backport to the release-3.4 branch is here, for