On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 01:56:04AM -0400, Rajesh Amaravathi wrote:
As to whether we can disable parts of kernel NFS (I'm assuming e.g NLM), I
think
its not really necessary since we can mount other exports with nolock option.
If we take out NLM or disable NLM at the kernel level, then every
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:16:24AM -0400, Krishna Srinivas wrote:
It was pretty confusing to read this thread. Hope I can clarify the
questions here.
Thanks. I was confused.
The other discussion in this thread was related to NLM which has been
implemented in 3.3.0. This is to support locking
-users@gluster.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:38:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost - reliable
or not?
Sorry my question was too vague. What I meant to ask is if it is possible,
since there is a conflict between the locking requests from the kernel's NFS
To: Rajesh Amaravathi raj...@redhat.com
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski man...@wpkg.org, Gluster General Discussion List
gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 5:28:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost - reliable
or not?
Was that introduced by the same
9:56:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost - reliable
or not?
Say, is it possible to compile a kernel without whatever part of its NFS
support competes with Gluster's locking?
Whit
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 08:14:27AM -0400, Rajesh Amaravathi wrote
gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:38:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost - reliable
or not?
Sorry my question was too vague. What I meant to ask is if it is possible,
since there is a conflict between the locking requests from the kernel's
Chmielewski man...@wpkg.org, Gluster General Discussion List
gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 5:28:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost - reliable
or not?
Was that introduced by the same person who thought that binding to
sequential
Try 3.3.0 - 3.2.6 has issues with NFS in general (memory leaks, etc).
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Chmielewski man...@wpkg.org
Date: Thursday, 12 July 2012 5:56 PM
To: Gluster General Discussion List gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: [Gluster-users] NFS mounts with glusterd
: Thursday, 12 July 2012 5:56 PM
To: Gluster General Discussion List gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: [Gluster-users] NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost - reliable
or not?
Hi,
are NFS mounts made on a single server (i.e. where glusterd is running)
supposed to be stable (with gluster 3.2.6
Original Message -
From: Tomasz Chmielewski man...@wpkg.org
To: James Kahn jk...@idea11.com.au
Cc: Gluster General Discussion List gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 1:51:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost - reliable
or not?
On 07/13
On 07/13/2012 05:08 PM, Rajesh Amaravathi wrote:
The issue was reported earlier, but I don't see any references it was
fixed in 3.3.0:
Deadlock happens when writing a file big enough to fill the
filesystem cache and kernel is trying to flush it to free some
memory for
On 7/13/12 5:29 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Killing the option to use NFS mounts on localhost is certainly quite
the opposite to my performance needs!
He was saying you can't run kernel NFS server and gluster NFS server at
the same time, on the same host. There is nothing stopping you
On 07/13/2012 05:46 PM, David Coulson wrote:
On 7/13/12 5:29 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Killing the option to use NFS mounts on localhost is certainly quite
the opposite to my performance needs!
He was saying you can't run kernel NFS server and gluster NFS server at
the same time, on
, 2012 3:16:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost - reliable
or not?
On 7/13/12 5:29 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Killing the option to use NFS mounts on localhost is certainly quite
the opposite to my performance needs!
He was saying you can't run kernel NFS
.
- Original Message -
From: David Coulson da...@davidcoulson.net
To: Tomasz Chmielewski man...@wpkg.org
Cc: Rajesh Amaravathi raj...@redhat.com, Gluster General Discussion List
gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 3:16:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] NFS mounts with glusterd
-
From: David Coulson da...@davidcoulson.net
To: Rajesh Amaravathi raj...@redhat.com
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski man...@wpkg.org, Gluster General Discussion List
gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 5:28:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost
Hi,
are NFS mounts made on a single server (i.e. where glusterd is running)
supposed to be stable (with gluster 3.2.6)?
I'm using the following line in /etc/fstab:
localhost:/sites /var/ftp/sites nfs _netdev,mountproto=tcp,nfsvers=3,bg 0 0
The problem is, after some time (~1-6 hours),
17 matches
Mail list logo
