Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2019-03-19 Thread Vijay Bellur
I tried this configuration on my local setup and the test passed fine. Adding the fuse and write-behind maintainers in Gluster to check if they are aware of any oddities with using mmap & fuse. Thanks, Vijay On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:21 PM Jim Kinney wrote: > Volume Name: home > Type:

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2019-03-19 Thread Jim Kinney
Volume Name: home Type: Replicate Volume ID: 5367adb1-99fc-44c3-98c4-71f7a41e628a Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: tcp,rdma Bricks: Brick1: bmidata1:/data/glusterfs/home/brick/brick Brick2: bmidata2:/data/glusterfs/home/brick/brick Options Reconfigured:

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2019-03-19 Thread Vijay Bellur
Thank you for the reproducer! Can you please let us know the output of `gluster volume info`? Regards, Vijay On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:53 PM Jim Kinney wrote: > This python will fail when writing to a file in a glusterfs fuse mounted > directory. > > import mmap > > # write a simple example

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2019-03-19 Thread Jim Kinney
This python will fail when writing to a file in a glusterfs fuse mounted directory. import mmap # write a simple example filewith open("hello.txt", "wb") as f:f.write("Hello Python!\n") with open("hello.txt", "r+b") as f:# memory-map the file, size 0 means whole filemm =

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2019-03-19 Thread Jim Kinney
Native mount issue with multiple clients (centos7 glusterfs 3.12). Seems to hit python 2.7 and 3+. User tries to open file(s) for write on long process and system eventually times out. Switching to NFS stops the error. No bug notice yet. Too many pans on the fire :-( On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 18:42

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2019-03-19 Thread Hans Henrik Happe
On 19/03/2019 14.10, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: > Hi Hans, > > Thanks for the honest feedback. Appreciate this. > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:39 PM Hans Henrik Happe > wrote: > > Hi, > > Looking into something else I fell over this proposal. Being a > shop

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2019-03-19 Thread Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan
Hi Jim, On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:21 PM Jim Kinney wrote: > > Issues with glusterfs fuse mounts cause issues with python file open for > write. We have to use nfs to avoid this. > > Really want to see better back-end tools to facilitate cleaning up of > glusterfs failures. If system is going to

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2019-03-19 Thread Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan
Hi Hans, Thanks for the honest feedback. Appreciate this. On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:39 PM Hans Henrik Happe wrote: > Hi, > > Looking into something else I fell over this proposal. Being a shop that > are going into "Leaving GlusterFS" mode, I thought I would give my two > cents. > > While

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2019-03-19 Thread Jim Kinney
0">For my uses, the RDMA transport is essential. Much of my storage is used for HPC systems and IB is the network layer. We still use v3.12. Issues with glusterfs fuse mounts cause issues with python file open for write. We have to use nfs to avoid this. Really want to see better back-end

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2019-03-19 Thread Hans Henrik Happe
Hi, Looking into something else I fell over this proposal. Being a shop that are going into "Leaving GlusterFS" mode, I thought I would give my two cents. While being partially an HPC shop with a few Lustre filesystems,  we chose GlusterFS for an archiving solution (2-3 PB), because we could

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2018-07-23 Thread Amar Tumballi
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 8:21 PM, Gudrun Mareike Amedick < g.amed...@uni-luebeck.de> wrote: > Hi, > > we're planning a dispersed volume with at least 50 project directories. > Each of those has its own quota ranging between 0.1TB and 200TB. Comparing > XFS > project quotas over several servers and

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2018-07-23 Thread Gudrun Mareike Amedick
Hi, we're planning a dispersed volume with at least 50 project directories. Each of those has its own quota ranging between 0.1TB and 200TB. Comparing XFS project quotas over several servers and bricks to make sure their total matches the desired value doesn't really sound practical. It would

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2018-07-20 Thread Amar Tumballi
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:46 PM, mabi wrote: > Hi Amar, > > Just wanted to say that I think the quota feature in GlusterFS is really > useful. In my case I use it on one volume where I have many cloud > installations (mostly files) for different people and all these need to > have a different

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2018-07-19 Thread mabi
Hi Amar, Just wanted to say that I think the quota feature in GlusterFS is really useful. In my case I use it on one volume where I have many cloud installations (mostly files) for different people and all these need to have a different quota set on a specific directory. The GlusterFS quota

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2018-07-19 Thread Amar Tumballi
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Jim Kinney wrote: > Too bad the RDMA will be abandoned. It's the perfect transport for > intranode processing and data sync. > > > I currently use RDMA on a computational cluster between nodes and gluster > storage. The older IB cards will support 10G IP and

Re: [Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2018-07-19 Thread Jim Kinney
Too bad the RDMA will be abandoned. It's the perfect transport for intranode processing and data sync. I currently use RDMA on a computational cluster between nodes and gluster storage. The older IB cards will support 10G IP and 40G IB. I've had some success with connectivity but am still

[Gluster-users] Proposal to mark few features as Deprecated / SunSet from Version 5.0

2018-07-19 Thread Amar Tumballi
*Hi all,Over last 12 years of Gluster, we have developed many features, and continue to support most of it till now. But along the way, we have figured out better methods of doing things. Also we are not actively maintaining some of these features.We are now thinking of cleaning up some of these