t;, "Joseph Fernandes"
> <josfe...@redhat.com>, "Nithya Balachandran" <nbala...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 7:59:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] SSD tier experimenting
>
>
>
> On 05/05/2016 05:11 PM, Sergei Hanus wrote:
>
On 05/05/2016 05:11 PM, Sergei Hanus wrote:
> Dan, looks like you are right - after some time I see performance
> around equal for both aforementioned volume.
You mean Rafi ;)
>
> Do you have any idea, how long should it take to normalize? Or, maybe,
> some commands or hints to monitor the
Dan, looks like you are right - after some time I see performance around
equal for both aforementioned volume.
Do you have any idea, how long should it take to normalize? Or, maybe, some
commands or hints to monitor the process?
And, another question - when I modify some volume option (like,
On 05/05/2016 03:59 PM, Sergei Hanus wrote:
> Hi, Dan, Mohammed.
> Sorry for the long pause, was busy with another project.
>
> I was able to test the situation again - and looks like you are right.
> When I create non-tiered volume, put load on it and then attach tier -
> performance gets
..@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 9:40:22 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] SSD tier experimenting
>>
>> Mohammed, thank you once more for getting involved.
>> Workload is artificial - I use IOmeter to generate iops. I use 512b, 50%
>> random
On 05/02/2016 01:19 PM, Sergei Hanus wrote:
> Good day, colleagues.
>
> I'm experimenting with adding tier to gluster volume. The problem I
> face - after adding tier, the volume status is stuck "in progress" :
>
> Task Status of Volume data
>
Good day, colleagues.
I'm experimenting with adding tier to gluster volume. The problem I face -
after adding tier, the volume status is stuck "in progress" :
Task Status of Volume data
--
Task : Tier
