Re: [Gluster-users] df reports wrong full capacity for distributed volumes (Glusterfs 3.12.6-1)

On 1 March 2018 at 15:25, Jose V. Carrión wrote: > I'm sorry for my last incomplete message. > > Below the output of both volumes: > > [root@stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status > Node Rebalanced-files size >

Re: [Gluster-users] df reports wrong full capacity for distributed volumes (Glusterfs 3.12.6-1)

I'm sorry for my last incomplete message. Below the output of both volumes: [root@stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s

Re: [Gluster-users] df reports wrong full capacity for distributed volumes (Glusterfs 3.12.6-1)

Hi Nithya, Below the output of both volumes: [root@stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s -

Re: [Gluster-users] df reports wrong full capacity for distributed volumes (Glusterfs 3.12.6-1)

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 22:31, Jose V. Carrión wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. > A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks > per volume). > Of course, then to add the

Re: [Gluster-users] df reports wrong full capacity for distributed volumes (Glusterfs 3.12.6-1)

Hi Nithya, My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks per volume). Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance force' operation. This task finished successfully (you

Re: [Gluster-users] df reports wrong full capacity for distributed volumes (Glusterfs 3.12.6-1)

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 18:28, Jose V. Carrión wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: > > That is good to hear. > [root@stor1 ~]# df -h > FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1

Re: [Gluster-users] df reports wrong full capacity for distributed volumes (Glusterfs 3.12.6-1)

Hi Nithya, I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: [root@stor1 ~]# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 /dev/sdc1 50T 16T 34T 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1

Re: [Gluster-users] df reports wrong full capacity for distributed volumes (Glusterfs 3.12.6-1)

Hi Jose, There is a known issue with gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you may be running into this. The "shared-brick-count" values seem fine on stor1. Please send us "grep -n "share" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/volumedisk1/*" results for the other nodes so we can check if they are the cause.

[Gluster-users] df reports wrong full capacity for distributed volumes (Glusterfs 3.12.6-1)

Hi, Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I realized that the total size reported by df command was changed and is smaller than the aggregated capacity of all the bricks in the volume. I checked that all the volumes status are fine, all the glusterd daemons are