Re: [Gluster-users] rsync to gluster mount: self-heal and bad performance

On 11/17/2015 08:19 AM, Tiemen Ruiten wrote: I double-checked my config and found out that the filesystem of the brick on the arbiter node doesn't support ACLs: underlying fs is ext4 without acl mount option, while the other bricks are XFS ( where it's always enabled). Do all the bricks need

Re: [Gluster-users] rsync to gluster mount: self-heal and bad performance

ot;Ben Turner" <btur...@redhat.com> > > Cc: "gluster-users" <gluster-users@gluster.org> > > Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 5:00:20 AM > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] rsync to gluster mount: self-heal and bad > performance > > > > Hello Ben, >

Re: [Gluster-users] rsync to gluster mount: self-heal and bad performance

- Original Message - > From: "Tiemen Ruiten" <t.rui...@rdmedia.com> > To: "Ben Turner" <btur...@redhat.com> > Cc: "gluster-users" <gluster-users@gluster.org> > Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 5:00:20 AM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-

Re: [Gluster-users] rsync to gluster mount: self-heal and bad performance

<btur...@redhat.com> wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Tiemen Ruiten" <t.rui...@rdmedia.com> > > To: "gluster-users" <gluster-users@gluster.org> > > Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 5:22:08 AM > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-use

Re: [Gluster-users] rsync to gluster mount: self-heal and bad performance

Any other suggestions? On 13 November 2015 at 09:56, Tiemen Ruiten wrote: > Hello Ernie, list, > > No, that's not the case. The volume is mounted through glusterfs-fuse - on > the same server running one of the bricks. The fstab: > > # /etc/fstab > # Created by anaconda on

Re: [Gluster-users] rsync to gluster mount: self-heal and bad performance

Hello Ernie, list, No, that's not the case. The volume is mounted through glusterfs-fuse - on the same server running one of the bricks. The fstab: # /etc/fstab # Created by anaconda on Tue Aug 18 18:10:49 2015 # # Accessible filesystems, by reference, are maintained under '/dev/disk' # See man

Re: [Gluster-users] rsync to gluster mount: self-heal and bad performance

Hi Tiemen It sounds like you're trying to rsync files onto your Gluster server, rather than to the Gluster filesystem. You want to copy these files into the mounted filesystem (typically on some other system than the Gluster servers), because Gluster is designed to handle it that way. I

[Gluster-users] rsync to gluster mount: self-heal and bad performance

Hello, While rsyncing to a directory mounted through glusterfs fuse, performance is very bad and it appears every synced file generates a (metadata) self-heal. The volume is mounted with option acl and acl's are set on a subdirectory. Setup is as follows: Two Centos 7 VM's (KVM), with Gluster