[Gluster-users] gverify.sh purpose

Hi, When creating a geo-replication session is the gverify.sh used or ran respectively? or is gverify.sh just an ad-hoc command to test manually if creating a geo-replication creationg would succeed? Best, M.___ Gluster-users mailing list

[Gluster-users] Glustershd error - Cannot assign requested address to port 24007

Hello, I created a small cluster with 5 servers on ubuntu 16.04 and everything is working ok so far, but I experience a weird problem with glustershd. On all servers I get following error: Aug 18 22:13:55 ws1 glustershd[16078]: [2017-08-18 20:13:55.604910] E [socket.c:3287:socket_connect]

[Gluster-users] Corrupted geo-replication CHANGELOG after running out of space in LVM thin pool.

Hi, I have a gluster cluster running with geo-replication. The volume that is being geo-replicated is running on a LVM thin pool. The thin pool overflowed causing a crash. I extended the thin pool LV and remounted which brought the volume back online and healthy. When I try to restart the

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7

You're hitting a race here. By the time glusterd tries to resolve the address of one of the remote bricks of a particular volume, the n/w interface is not up by that time. We have fixed this issue in mainline and 3.12 branch through the following commit: commit

Re: [Gluster-users] Is transport=rdma tested with "stripe"?

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Hatazaki, Takao wrote: >> Note that "stripe" is not tested much and practically unmaintained. > > Ah, this was what I suspected. Understood. I'll be happy with "shard". > > Having said that, "stripe" works fine with transport=tcp. The

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: >> >> You're hitting a race here. By the time glusterd tries to resolve the >> address of one of the remote bricks of a particular

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > 18.08.2017 12:21, Atin Mukherjee пишет: > > > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 at 13:45, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Atin Mukherjee >> wrote: >> > >> > >> >

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7

On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 at 13:45, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Atin Mukherjee > > wrote: > >> > >> You're hitting a race here. By the

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:22:33PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > You're hitting a race here. By the time glusterd tries to resolve the > > address of one of the remote bricks of a particular volume, the n/w > >

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > You're hitting a race here. By the time glusterd tries to resolve the > address of one of the remote bricks of a particular volume, the n/w > interface is not up by that time. We have fixed this issue in mainline and

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:22:33PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > You're hitting a race here. By the time glusterd tries to resolve the > address of one of the remote bricks of a particular volume, the n/w > interface is not up by that time. We have fixed this issue in mainline and > 3.12 branch

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7

18.08.2017 12:21, Atin Mukherjee пишет: On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 at 13:45, Raghavendra Talur > wrote: On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 18,

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] How commonly applications make use of fadvise?

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Ravishankar N wrote: > > > On 08/11/2017 04:51 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:47:47AM -0400, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> In a conversation between me, Milind and Csaba, Milind pointed out >>>

[Gluster-users] through a vpn tunnel?

hi fellas I wonder if gluster with a peer connected via vpn tunnel is something you would use for production? @devel - is such a scenario even a valid(approved) one? many thanks, L. ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-users] Is transport=rdma tested with "stripe"?

Hi, I have followings in /etc/hosts on all hosts: 172.31.22.2 gluster-s1 #eno1 on the server #1 (hostname) 172.31.150.2 gluster-s1-fdr #ib0 on the server #1 172.31.22.3 gluster-s2 #eno1 on the server #2 (hostname) 172.31.150.3 gluster-s2-fdr #ib0 on the server #2 Peer probe was done for