On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
ondrej.valou...@s3group.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gluster will never perform well for small files.
>
> I believe there is nothing you can do with this.
>
It is bad compared to a disk filesystem but I believe it is much closer to
NFS now.
Andreas,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
> ondrej.valou...@s3group.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Gluster will never perform well for small files.
>>
>> I believe there is nothing you can do with t
Well, it might be close to the _synchronous_ nfs, but it is still well behind
of the asynchronous nfs performance.
Simple script (bit extreme I know, but helps to draw the picture):
#!/bin/csh
set HOSTNAME=`/bin/hostname`
set j=1
while ($j <= 7000)
echo ahoj > test.$HOSTNAME.$j
@ j++
end
r
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
ondrej.valou...@s3group.com> wrote:
> Well, it might be close to the _*synchronous*_ nfs, but it is still well
> behind of the asynchronous nfs performance.
>
> Simple script (bit extreme I know, but helps to draw the picture):
>
>
>
> #!/bin/csh
Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative cache, but
enabling that did not make much effect).
To me, this is no surprise – nothing can match nfs performance for small files
for obvious reasons:
1. Single server, does not have to deal with distributed locks
2.
Hi Kotresh,
thanks for your repsonse...
answers inside...
best regards
Dietmar
Am 13.03.2018 um 06:38 schrieb Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar:
Hi Dietmar,
I am trying to understand the problem and have few questions.
1. Is trashcan enabled only on master volume?
no, trashcan is also enabled on
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
ondrej.valou...@s3group.com> wrote:
> Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative cache,
> but enabling that did not make much effect).
>
> To me, this is no surprise – nothing can match nfs performance for small
> files for
Sorry - no time to play with that. But it’s simple to reproduce, just set up
your of async nfs server, take my script and you will see on your own.
Ondrej
From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkara...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 10:41 AM
To: Ondrej Valousek
Cc: Andreas Ericsson ;
Hi,
Maybe someone can point me to a documentation or explain this? I can't
find it myself.
Do we have any other useful resources except doc.gluster.org? As I see
many gluster options are not described there or there are no explanation
what is doing...
On 2018-03-12 15:58, Anatoliy Dmytriye
Hi Kotresh,
...another test. this time the trashcan was enabled on master only. as
in the test before it's a gfs 3.12.6 on ubuntu 16.04.4
the geo rep error appeared again and disabling the trashcan does not
change anything.
as in the former test the error appears when i try to list files in the
Hi Anatoliy,
The heal command is basically used to heal any mismatching contents between
replica copies of the files.
For the command "gluster volume heal " to succeed, you should have
the self-heal-daemon running,
which is true only if your volume is of type replicate/disperse.
In your case you h
Can we add a smarter error message for this situation by checking volume
type first?
Cheers,
Laura B
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018, Karthik Subrahmanya
wrote:
> Hi Anatoliy,
>
> The heal command is basically used to heal any mismatching contents
> between replica copies of the files.
> For the c
The Gluster community celebrates 13 years of development with this
latest release, Gluster 4.0. This release enables improved integration
with containers, an enhanced user experience, and a next-generation
management framework. The 4.0 release helps cloud-native app developers
choose Gluster as the
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:33 AM, Laura Bailey wrote:
> Can we add a smarter error message for this situation by checking volume
> type first?
Yes we can. I will do that.
Thanks,
Karthik
>
> Cheers,
> Laura B
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 14, 2018, Karthik Subrahmanya
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Anatoliy,
>>
14 matches
Mail list logo