Re: [Gluster-users] geo-replication 3.6.7 - no transition from hybrid to changelog crawl

Hi Dietmar, After discussion with Aravinda we realized that unfortunately the suggestion to: setfattr -n glusterfs.geo-rep.trigger-sync -v "1" setfattr -n glusterfs.geo-rep.trigger-sync -v "1" won't work with 3.6.7, since provision for that workaround was added after 3.6.7. There's

Re: [Gluster-users] geo-rep: remote operation failed - No such file or directory

IMPORTANT: please note that "gluster volume delete" will delete your volume configuration -- Milind - Original Message ----- From: "Milind Changire" <mchan...@redhat.com> To: "ML mail" <mlnos...@yahoo.com> Cc: "Gluster-users" &

Re: [Gluster-users] geo-rep: remote operation failed - No such file or directory

over again. You can delete the volume with: # gluster volume stop # gluster volume delete -- Milind - Original Message - From: "ML mail" <mlnos...@yahoo.com> To: "Milind Changire" <mchan...@redhat.com> Cc: "Gluster-users" <gluster-users@glust

Re: [Gluster-users] geo-rep: remote operation failed - No such file or directory

set the virtual xattr on the directory starting at OC_DEFAULT_MODULE and then on the entries inside the directory, and so on down the directory tree. -- Milind - Original Message - From: "ML mail" <mlnos...@yahoo.com> To: "Milind Changire" <mchan...@redhat.c

Re: [Gluster-users] geo-rep: remote operation failed - No such file or directory

are done setting the xattr for the entire directory tree. -- Milind - Original Message - From: "ML mail" <mlnos...@yahoo.com> To: "Milind Changire" <mchan...@redhat.com> Cc: "Gluster-users" <gluster-users@gluster.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 24,

Re: [Gluster-users] geo-rep: remote operation failed - No such file or directory

://review.gluster.org/#/c/9337/ -- Milind - Original Message - From: "ML mail" <mlnos...@yahoo.com> To: "Milind Changire" <mchan...@redhat.com> Cc: "Gluster-users" <gluster-users@gluster.org> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 9:10:56 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [Gluster-users] geo-replication 3.6.7 - no transition from hybrid to changelog crawl

gt; directory-level with the same name... > > best regards > dietmar > > > > > > > Am 20.01.2016 um 19:28 schrieb Milind Changire: > > Dietmar, > I just looked at your very first post describing the problem and I found > > ignore_deletes: true > > in the

Re: [Gluster-users] geo-replication 3.6.7 - no transition from hybrid to changelog crawl

different gfid > than on the master...like for any other files which are deleted and later > recreated while geo-rep is in hybrid crawl. is that right ? > if so it will be difficult to reach the changelog modus on large gluster > volumes because in our case the initial hybrid crawl took

Re: [Gluster-users] geo-rep: remote operation failed - No such file or directory

f1 ... ... If not, then it would help if you could send the sequence of file management operations. -- Milind - Original Message - From: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar" <khire...@redhat.com> To: "ML mail" <mlnos...@yahoo.com> Cc: "Gluster-users&

Re: [Gluster-users] Backup data from gluster Brick

- Original Message - From: "M S Vishwanath Bhat" To: "Kim Jahn" Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:25:40 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Backup data from gluster Brick On 16 February 2016 at 18:03, Kim Jahn <

[Gluster-users] updatedb and gluster volumes

Would it be wise to prevent updatedb from crawling ALL Gluster volumes ? i.e. at the brick for servers as well as on the mount point for clients The implementation would be to add glusterfs as a file system type to updatedb.conf against the PRUNEFS variable setting. -- Milind

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster RPC Internals - Lecture #1 - recording

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Milind Changire <mchan...@redhat.com> wrote: https://bluejeans.com/s/e59Wh/ -- Milind ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] Fwd: Very slow performance when enabling tierd storage with SSD

Benjamin, There are three issues of interest: 1. Since the hot tier reached 90% of its capacity, the nature and frequency of accesses of files are important Aggressive file accesses will cause a flood of promotions, although sequentially, hampering performance. Abstaining from access

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] decoupling network.ping-timeout and transport.tcp-user-timeout

+gluster-users Milind On 01/11/2017 03:21 PM, Milind Changire wrote: The management connection uses network.ping-timeout to time out and retry connection to a different server if the existing connection end-point is unreachable from the client. Due to the nature of the parameters involved

Re: [Gluster-users] 0-client_t: null client [Invalid argument] & high CPU usage (Gluster 3.12)

Sam, You might want to give glusterfs-3.12.1 a try instead. On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Sam McLeod wrote: > Howdy, > > I'm setting up several gluster 3.12 clusters running on CentOS 7 and have > having issues with glusterd.log and glustershd.log both being

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterd proccess hangs on reboot

erfs/3.10.5/rpc-transport/socket.so > > #17 0x7f9283493ffe in socket_event_handler () from > > /usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.10.5/rpc-transport/socket.so > > #18 0x00310fe87806 in event_dispatch_epoll_worker () from > > /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0 > > #19 0x003d99c0

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterd proccess hangs on reboot

Serkan, I have gone through other mails in the mail thread as well but responding to this one specifically. Is this a source install or an RPM install ? If this is an RPM install, could you please install the glusterfs-debuginfo RPM and retry to capture the gdb backtrace. If this is a source

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster tiering errors

Herb, What are the high and low watermarks for the tier set at ? # gluster volume get cluster.watermark-hi # gluster volume get cluster.watermark-low What is the size of the file that failed to migrate as per the following tierd log: [2017-10-19 17:52:07.519614] I [MSGID: 109038]

Re: [Gluster-users] SSL configuration

Enrico, You might find this helpful if not already used: https://kshlm.in/post/network-encryption-in-glusterfs/ -- Milind On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Enrico Valsecchi wrote: > Hello subscribers, > > I have a very strange question regarding SSL setup on gluster

Re: [Gluster-users] Client un-mounting since upgrade to 3.12.9-1 version

Kashif, You can change the log level by: $ gluster volume set diagnostics.brick-log-level TRACE $ gluster volume set diagnostics.client-log-level TRACE and see how things fare If you want fewer logs you can change the log-level to DEBUG instead of TRACE. On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:37 PM,

Re: [Gluster-users] Client un-mounting since upgrade to 3.12.9-1 version

gt;> > > > You could also grep for crash in the client log file and the lines > following crash would have a backtrace in most cases. > > HTH, > Vijay > > >> >> Thanks for your help. >> >> Kashif >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018

Re: [Gluster-users] Client un-mounting since upgrade to 3.12.9-1 version

t; > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 5:01 PM, mohammad kashif > wrote: > >> Hi Milind >> >> I will send you links for logs. >> >> I collected these core dumps at client and there is no glusterd process >> running on client. >> >> Kashif >>

Re: [Gluster-users] Client un-mounting since upgrade to 3.12.9-1 version

5:01 PM, mohammad kashif >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Milind >>>> >>>> I will send you links for logs. >>>> >>>> I collected these core dumps at client and there is no glusterd process >>>> running on client. >>

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterfs fuse uses system ports to mount remote bricks

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Canh Ngo wrote: > Hi all, > > We run a storage cluster using GlusterFS v3.10.12 on CentOS7. Clients > (CentOS) are using glusterfs 3.8.4. > > We notice when clients mounts bricks of a volume, sometimes glusterfs uses > system ports (i.e. in port range 0-1024) to

Re: [Gluster-users] Client un-mounting since upgrade to 3.12.9-1 version

ntation fault > . > > The problem is not limited to one client but happening to many clients. > > I will really appreciate any help as whole file system has become unusable > > Thanks > > Kashif > > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Milind Changire > wr

Re: [Gluster-users] Understand Geo Replication of a big Gluster

Hello Axel, A warm welcome to you and happy to see you board the Gluster ship. geo-replication requires two clusters: one master cluster which is the source cluster and the second cluster called the slave cluster which is the destination cluster Just as you have created a primary/master cluster,

Re: [Gluster-users] How to set up a 4 way gluster file system

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Thing wrote: > Hi, > > I have 4 servers each with 1TB of storage set as /dev/sdb1, I would like > to set these up in a raid 10 which will? give me 2TB useable. So Mirrored > and concatenated? > > The command I am running is as per

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster tiering errors

ster.lookup-optimize: on > client.event-threads: 4 > server.event-threads: 4 > performance.write-behind-window-size: 4MB > performance.cache-size: 16GB > features.quota-deem-statfs: on > features.inode-quota: on > features.quota: on > nfs.disable: on > transport.address-family: inet > featur

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] cluster/dht: restrict migration of opened files

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > All, > > Patch [1] prevents migration of opened files during rebalance operation. > If patch [1] affects you, please voice out your concerns. [1] is a stop-gap > fix for the problem discussed in issues [2][3] > >

Re: [Gluster-users] Backup Solutions for GlusterFS

You might want to take a look at Bareos: https://www.bareos.org, https://www.bareos.com Bareos has a plug-in integration with Glusterfs which facilitates Gluster as a source as well as a destination for their Backup and Restore Application. On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Bartosz Zięba

Re: [Gluster-users] Disperse volumes on armhf

What is the endianness of the armhf CPU ? Are you running a 32bit or 64bit Operating System ? On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Fox wrote: > Just wondering if anyone else is running into the same behavior with > disperse volumes described below and what I might be able to do about it. > > I am

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluter 3.12.12: performance during heal and in general

OLLERR - disconnecting now >> [2018-08-22 06:20:49.291575] I [socket.c:2474:socket_event_handler] >> 0-transport: EPOLLERR - disconnecting now >> >> every 3 seconds. Looks like this bug: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484885 - but that shoud >> h

Re: [Gluster-users] Was: Upgrade to 4.1.2 geo-replication does not work Now: Upgraded to 4.1.3 geo node Faulty

Marcus, Is it possible to send over the SELinux errors that you encountered before turning it off ? We could inspect and get the SELinux issues fixed as an aside. On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Marcus Pedersén wrote: > Hi Kotresh, > > I have been running 4.1.3 from the end of August. > >

Re: [Gluster-users] Understanding client logs

Marcus, Please paste the name-version-release of the primary glusterfs package on your system. If possible, also describe the typical workload that happens at the mount via the user application. On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Marcus Pedersén wrote: > Hi all, > I

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster cluster on two networks

Marcus, Can you share server-side gluster peer probe and client-side mount command-lines. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:36 AM, Marcus Pedersén wrote: > Hi all! > > I have setup a replicated/distributed gluster cluster 2 x (2 + 1). > > Centos 7 and gluster version 3.12.6

Re: [Gluster-users] Question concerning TLS encryption of network traffic

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 6:58 PM, David Spisla wrote: > Hello Gluster Community, > > according to that set steps I have configured network encryption for > management and I/O traffic: > https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/how-to-enable-tlsssl- >

Re: [Gluster-users] Release 3.12.8: Scheduled for the 12th of April

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote: > Hi, > > It's time to prepare the 3.12.8 release, which falls on the 10th of > each month, and hence would be 12-04-2018 this time around. > > This mail is to call out the following, > > 1) Are there any pending

Re: [Gluster-users] Upgrade 5.3 -> 5.4 on debian: public IP is used instead of LAN IP

There are probably DNS entries or /etc/hosts entries with the public IP Addresses that the host names (gluster1, gluster2, gluster3) are getting resolved to. /etc/resolv.conf would tell which is the default domain searched for the node names and the DNS servers which respond to the queries. On

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Version uplift query

you might want to check what build.log says ... especially at the very bottom Here's a hint from StackExhange . On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:42 PM ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > I am trying to build Gluster5.4 but getting below

[Gluster-users] Gluster RPC Internals Lecture by Raghavendra G

BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:-//PYVOBJECT//NONSGML Version 1//EN BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Asia/Kolkata TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo-outlook/Asia/Kolkata X-LIC-LOCATION:Asia/Kolkata BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0530 TZOFFSETTO:+0530 TZNAME:IST DTSTART:19700101T00

[Gluster-users] Gluster RPC Internals - Lecture #2

BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:-//PYVOBJECT//NONSGML Version 1//EN BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Asia/Kolkata TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo-outlook/Asia/Kolkata X-LIC-LOCATION:Asia/Kolkata BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0530 TZOFFSETTO:+0530 TZNAME:IST DTSTART:19700101T00