Re: [Gluster-users] Questions about gluster reblance

and the theory so I'm not sure who created those linkto files and why the linkto file are created. I am going to leave this part as, dht_linkfile_create does this and mostly would happen during lookup. Shyam ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] cannot delete non-empty directory

will step up the priority on this so that we have a clean fix that can be used to prevent this in the future. Shyam ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Feature support: development of metadata service xlator plugin in glusterfs.

trips to improve performance (next). Foot note: None of this is ready yet, and would take time, this is just a *possible* direction that gluster core is going ahead with to address various problems at scale. Shyam [1] http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features/caching

Re: [Gluster-users] Test results and Performance Tuning efforts ...

1 client.event-threads: 1 In your gluster v info output then I think it will negate things. @Shyam - can you confirm / deny this? The change is to the *glusterd* vol file (by editing the same), so the client and brick vol files should retain the event-threads as is. -b On Tue, Oct 13, 2

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Idea: Alternate Release process

On 05/29/2016 10:08 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com> wrote: On 05/19/2016 10:25 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: Once every 3 months i.e. option 3 sounds good to me. +1 from my end. Every 2 months seems to be a bit to

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Default quorum for 2 way replication

On 03/04/2016 07:30 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On 03/04/2016 05:47 PM, Bipin Kunal wrote: HI Pranith, Thanks for starting this mail thread. Looking from a user perspective most important is to get a "good copy" of data. I agree that people use replication for HA but having stale

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Default quorum for 2 way replication

On 03/05/2016 05:26 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: That is the point. There is an illusion of choice between Data integrity and HA. But we are not *really* giving HA, are we? HA will be there only if second brick in the replica pair goes down. In your typical @Pranith, can you elaborate on

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Idea: Alternate Release process

On 05/19/2016 10:25 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: Once every 3 months i.e. option 3 sounds good to me. +1 from my end. Every 2 months seems to be a bit too much, 4 months is still fine, but gives us 1 in 3 to pick the LTS, I like 1:4 odds better for the LTS, hence the 3 months (or

Re: [Gluster-users] gluster profile mode - showing unexpected WRITE fops

showing up the initial writes that were performed to populate the volume. From the code I do not see seek tracked in iostats, so it is not the *seek* that is bloating these numbers up. Regards, Shyam On 08/08/2016 04:47 PM, Jackie Tung wrote: Hi, I’m doing some benchmarking vs our trial

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Non Shared Persistent Gluster Storage with Kubernetes

On 07/01/2016 01:45 AM, B.K.Raghuram wrote: I have not gone through this implementation nor the new iscsi implementation being worked on for 3.9 but I thought I'd share the design behind a distributed iscsi implementation that we'd worked on some time back based on the istgt code with a libgfapi

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] IMP: Release 3.10 beta1 tagging (day-to-day slip and updates)

Release notes are still pending, other comments *inline*. Tomorrow we will release beta1 for the package maintainers to roll out the packages. On 01/31/2017 08:42 PM, Shyam wrote: Update day 2: 1) Brick multiplexing patch is merged into master, and now backported to release-3.10. Yay

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] IMP: Release 3.10 beta1 tagging (day-to-day slip and updates)

notes as commits, or respond here that there are none for their feature. This is important for the beta. Thanks, Shyam On 01/30/2017 02:55 PM, Shyam wrote: Hi, Before the release of 3.10 beta1, we are awaiting the merge of the following commits on master, and a backport of the same into the 3.10

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10 RC0 tagged

all is highly appreciated. For the antsy, git clone the repo and checkout v3.10.0rc0 tag to roll your own builds and test. (doc/release-notes/3.10.0.md has the release related features and bug fixes in it). Thanks, Shyam (Kaleb, Talur) ___ Gluster

[Gluster-users] IMP: Release 3.10 beta1 tagging (day-to-day slip and updates)

in the near future. Thanks, Shyam [1] Release notes: https://review.gluster.org/16481 [2] Bug to update release notes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417735 ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org

[Gluster-users] Release 3.10 RC1 tagged

an option, clone the source and checkout tag v3.10.0rc1 [2] Thanks, Shyam (Kaleb, Talur) [1] 3.10 Release notes: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.10/doc/release-notes/3.10.0.md [2] Clone source from, `git clone https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs.git

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] release-3.10: Final call for release notes updates

me. Either submit a patch, or give me some notes that I can polish and commit. Thanks, Shyam On 02/20/2017 03:35 AM, Xavier Hernandez wrote: Hi Shyam, I've added some comments [1] for the issue between disperse's dynamic code generator and SELinux. It assumes that [2] will be backported to 3.10.

Re: [Gluster-users] Issue in installing Gluster 3.9.0

Optionally try patching the sources with this commit and building, https://review.gluster.org/#/c/15737/2 Shyam On 02/09/2017 02:26 AM, Amudhan P wrote: Hi All, Using 'configure --disable-events` fixes above problem. Thank you, Niklas for forwarding this info. regards Amudhan On Sat, Dec

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10 RC1 tagged

repository Packages for ubuntu can be found here [2] OpenSuSE pacjages can be found here [3] CentOS packages should appear at [4] [5] soon Thanks, Shyam [1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.10/3.10.0rc1/ [2] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-3.10 [3

[Gluster-users] release-3.10: Final call for release notes updates

.). The release notes serve as our first point of public facing documentation about what is in a release, so any and all feedback and updates welcome here. The bug ID to use for updating the release notes would be [2] Example release notes commits are at [3] Thanks, Shyam [1] Current release notes

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10 RC0 tagged

/release-3.10/doc/release-notes/3.10.0.md On 02/02/2017 10:12 PM, Shyam wrote: Thanks to some last hour support from Jeff, Xavi, Nithya, Anoop, Kaleb and a few others, we now have RC0 tagged, and on its way to package maintainers. Expect an official RC0 release announcement with packages in a day

Re: [Gluster-users] rebalance and volume commit hash

On 01/17/2017 11:40 AM, Piotr Misiak wrote: 17 sty 2017 17:10 Jeff Darcy napisał(a): Do you think that is wise to run rebalance process manually on every brick with the actual commit hash value? I didn't do anything with bricks after previous rebalance run and I have

[Gluster-users] Release 3.10: Winding down!

Hi, Thanks for all the work and attention towards 3.10 LTM release of Gluster. The release packages have been built and a release announcement, with the details, will be rolled out soon. With this, here are some notes to remember, 1) The existing release bug tracker has been closed, and a

[Gluster-users] Announcing GlusterFS release 3.10

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10 (packages available at [1]). This is a major Gluster release that includes some substantial changes. The features revolve around, better support in container environments, scaling to larger number of bricks per node, and

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

On 08/17/2016 10:21 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: Here is one of the proposal from my end: "Gluster maintainers responsibilities" Theme - Process & Infrastructure - Tracking incoming reviews and managing pending review backlogs with the help of peer reviews/review marathon on a weekly basis - Bug

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

Theme: Gluster.Next Topic: "DHT2 - O Brother, Where Art Thou?" Description: An update on DHT2 design and it's progress, with the intention of enabling discussions around the love or lack of the same, for the proposed model. Shyam On 08/12/2016 03:48 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Talks and topics that need presenters (WAS: CFP for Gluster Developer Summit)

On 08/13/2016 03:59 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: In addition to Vijays request to submit talks, I would like to see some very specific topics presented/demo'd. Anyone attending the Summit and willing to take these on is very much encouraged to do so. To do so, reply to this (or Vijays) email with

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Weekly Community Meeting 12 Oct 2016 - Minutes

On 10/13/2016 09:20 AM, Joe Julian wrote: You forgot to count yourself: 6. But still ... 6 when there was 60(?) in Berlin seems light. I know the 4am time doesn't work for the west coast of America, but that only eliminates a very small percentage of those. What's up, everyone else? Can

Re: [Gluster-users] opportunist for outreachy

On 10/14/2016 10:48 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh wrote: Hi Soumya, Welcome to the community. Here[1] is the link for Gluster Documentation. I would suggest you to google and read a bit about GlusterFS and then get started with "Quick Start Guide[2]". Once you have done your setup and have played

[Gluster-users] Announcing release 3.10 schedule

: - Primary: Shyam <srang...@redhat.com> - Assisted by: Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> - Assisted by: Kaleb Keithly <kkeit...@redhat.com> We are changing a few things on how we are managing this release, so if you have features lined up for the release, read on! Previousl

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10: Feature list frozen

feature completion, so that branching can happen on time. Thank you, Shyam [1] Release 3.10 Project board: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/projects/1 ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman

[Gluster-users] Release 3.10: Feature page status (and call for reviews)

A) We need reviewers/maintainers to complete the reviews of the feature pages that are under review, and get them to an accepted state. B) We need the missing feature pages added, so that those can go through the required reviews. Just a reminder on the timelines, we have branching set to:

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.1: Scheduled for the 30th of March

: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.10/doc/release-notes/3.10.1.md Thanks, Shyam NOTE: Tracker bug for 3.10.1 will be closed in a couple of days and tracker for 3.10.2 will be opened, and an announcement for 3.10.2 will be sent with the details

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Proposal to deprecate replace-brick for "distribute only" volumes

, which we do not have. I would suggest a github issue be added for such support, and take in the prevention of current replace-brick on distribute only volumes as the first priority (for obvious reasons as stated by talur). Shyam ___ Gluster-users mai

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.1: Scheduled for the 30th of March

On 03/27/2017 12:59 PM, Shyam wrote: Hi, It's time to prepare the 3.10.1 release, which falls on the 30th of each month, and hence would be Mar-30th-2017 this time around. We have one blocker issue for the release, which is [1] "auth failure after upgrade to GlusterFS 3.10"

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.1: Scheduled for the 30th of March

On 03/27/2017 03:25 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: 2017-03-27 18:59 GMT+02:00 Shyam <srang...@redhat.com>: 1) Are there any pending *blocker* bugs that need to be tracked for 3.10.1? If so mark them against the provided tracker [2] as blockers for the release, or at the very least pos

[Gluster-users] GlusterFS 3.10.1 is available

Hi, The first update for GlusterFS 3.10 is available. Packages for this minor update are in the various repositories for the respective distributions that the gluster community supports. # Release notes for Gluster 3.10.1 This is a bugfix release. The release notes for [3.10.0](3.10.0.md),

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

On 04/17/2017 05:56 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: Further to the above, we are also considering the following features for this release, request feature owners to let us know if these are actively being worked on and if these will make the branching dates. (calling out folks that I think are

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

On 02/28/2017 10:17 AM, Shyam wrote: Hi, With release 3.10 shipped [1], it is time to set the dates for release 3.11 (and subsequently 4.0). This mail has the following sections, so please read or revisit as needed, - Release 3.11 dates (the schedule) - 3.11 focus areas Pinging the list

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

On 04/13/2017 11:32 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 02/28/2017 10:17 AM, Shyam wrote: Hi, With release 3.10 shipped [1], it is time to set the dates for

Re: [Gluster-users] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

On 02/28/2017 10:17 AM, Shyam wrote: Hi, With release 3.10 shipped [1], it is time to set the dates for release 3.11 (and subsequently 4.0). This mail has the following sections, so please read or revisit as needed, - 3.11 focus areas - Release owners Focusing on the above 2 sections

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

On 03/03/2017 06:44 AM, Prashanth Pai wrote: On 02/28/2017 08:47 PM, Shyam wrote: We should be transitioning to using github for feature reporting and tracking, more fully from this release. So once again, if there exists any confusion on that front, reach out to the lists for clarification

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.11.1 (Short Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.11.1 (packages available at [1]). Major changes and features (complete release notes can be found @ [2]) - Improved disperse (EC) volume performance - Group settings for enabling negative lookup caching are provided -

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

On 04/25/2017 10:08 AM, Shyam wrote: On 04/25/2017 07:40 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 02/28/2017 10:17 AM, Shyam wrote: 1) Halo - Initial Cut (@pranith) Sorry f

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

On 04/26/2017 03:53 AM, Soumya Koduri wrote: Hi Shyam, On 04/25/2017 07:38 PM, Shyam wrote: On 04/25/2017 07:40 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 02/28/2017 10:17 AM, Shyam

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

On 04/25/2017 07:40 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 02/28/2017 10:17 AM, Shyam wrote: 1) Halo - Initial Cut (@pranith) Sorry for the delay in response. Due to som

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Announcing release 3.11 : Scope, schedule and feature tracking

, it is better as otherwise it is difficult to use by the community. Considering this, I would suggest we (as in all concerned) work on these aspects and get it right in master before we take it in for a release. Thanks, Shyam ___ Gluster-users mailing list

[Gluster-users] Release 3.11: Rc1 and release tagging dates

against the release tracking bug [1]. Thanks, Shyam [1] Tracker BZ for 3.11.0 blockers: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.11.0 ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster

Re: [Gluster-users] Release 3.11: RC0 has been tagged

are (still) signed with 3.10 signing key. There will be a new signing key for the 3.11.0 GA and all following 3.11.X packages. Request testing feedback from the community, that can help us catch any major issue before the release. Tracker BZ is at [2] and release notes are at [3] Thanks, Shyam [5

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.2: Scheduled for the 30th of April

Thanks Talur! Further, for 3.10.3 as well Talur will be leading the release management work and we intend to release it on time, this time :) Shyam On 05/14/2017 04:32 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: Glusterfs 3.10.2 has been tagged. Packages for the various distributions will be available

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.11.1: Scheduled for 20th of June

On 06/20/2017 08:41 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi, It's time to prepare the 3.11.1 release, which falls on the 20th of each month [4], and hence would be Ju

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.11.1: Scheduled for 20th of June

, Shyam [1] Bug awaiting fix: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463250 "Releases are made better together" On 06/06/2017 09:24 AM, Shyam wrote: Hi, It's time to prepare the 3.11.1 release, which falls on the 20th of each month [4], and hence would be June-20th-2017 this t

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.11.1: Scheduled for 20th of June

On 06/21/2017 11:37 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi, Release tagging has been postponed by a day to accommodate a fix for a regression that has been introduced be

Re: [Gluster-users] Rebalance + VM corruption - current status and request for feedback

, Shyam On 06/05/2017 07:36 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: Great, thanks! Il 5 giu 2017 6:49 AM, "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhan...@redhat.com <mailto:kdhan...@redhat.com>> ha scritto: The fixes are already available in 3.10.2, 3.8.12 and 3.11.0 -Krutika On Sun,

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Backport for "Add back socket for polling of events immediately..."

On 05/30/2017 08:44 PM, Zhang Huan wrote: * Are there any existing users who need this enhancement? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358606#c27 Though not sure what branch Zhang Huan is on. @Zhang your inputs are needed here. We are currently on 3.8. Thus the performance number is

[Gluster-users] Release 3.12: Scope and calendar!

need exceptions granted to make it into the 3.12 release - Release date: August 30th, 2017 Release owners: - Shyam - Any volunteers? Features and major changes process in a nutshell: 1) Open a github issue 2) Refer the issue # in the commit messages of all changes against the feature (specs

Re: [Gluster-users] Add single server

On 05/01/2017 01:13 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri > wrote: On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta

Re: [Gluster-users] Add single server

On 05/01/2017 01:52 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: 2017-05-01 19:50 GMT+02:00 Shyam <srang...@redhat.com>: Splitting the bricks need not be a post factum decision, we can start with larger brick counts, on a given node/disk count, and hence spread these bricks to newer nodes/

Re: [Gluster-users] Add single server

On 05/01/2017 02:36 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com <mailto:gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com>> wrote: 2017-05-01 20:30 GMT+02:00 Shyam <srang...@redhat.com <mailto:s

Re: [Gluster-users] Add single server

On 05/01/2017 02:42 PM, Joe Julian wrote: On 05/01/2017 11:36 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com <mailto:gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com>> wrote: 2017-05-01 20:30 GMT+02:00

Re: [Gluster-users] Add single server

On 05/01/2017 02:23 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 05/01/2017 02:00 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: Splitting the bricks need not be a post factum deci

Re: [Gluster-users] Add single server

On 05/01/2017 02:42 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 05/01/2017 02:23 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Shyam <sran

Re: [Gluster-users] Add single server

On 05/01/2017 02:47 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 05/01/2017 02:42 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Shyam <sran

Re: [Gluster-users] Add single server

On 05/01/2017 02:25 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: 2017-05-01 20:22 GMT+02:00 Shyam <srang...@redhat.com>: Brick splitting (I think was first proposed by Jeff Darcy) is to create more bricks out of given storage backends. IOW, instead of using a given brick as is, create sub-dirs and us

Re: [Gluster-users] Add single server

On 05/01/2017 02:55 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com <mailto:gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com>> wrote: 2017-05-01 20:43 GMT+02:00 Shyam <srang...@redhat.com <mailto:srang...@red

[Gluster-users] Release 3.11: Has been Branched (and pending feature notes)

rents #174 (@skoduri) 4) Halo - Initial version (@pranith) Thanks, Kaushal, Shyam [1] 3.11 Branch: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/tree/release-3.11 [2] Tag for 3.11.0beta1 : https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/tree/v3.11.0beta1 [3] Tracker BZ for 3.11.0 blockers: https://bugzilla.

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Don't allow data loss via add-brick (was Re: Add single server)

mark it as blocking 3.10.2 release tracker bug. Thanks, Shyam On 05/02/2017 06:20 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com <mailto:pkara...@redhat.com>> wrote: Yeah it is a good idea. I asked him to raise

[Gluster-users] Announcing GlusterFS release 3.11.0 (Short Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.11.0 (packages available at [1]). This is a short term maintenance (STM) Gluster release that includes some substantial changes. he features revolve around, improvements to small file workloads, SE Linux support, Halo

[Gluster-users] Release 3.11.1: Scheduled for 20th of June

and get these going 3) Empty release notes are posted here [3], if there are any specific call outs for 3.11 beyond bugs, please update the review, or leave a comment in the review, for us to pick it up Thanks, Shyam/Kaushal [1] Release bug tracker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id

[Gluster-users] Unable to find the requested file. Please check the spelling and try again.

. thanks and regards Shyam Deshmukh ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] Client is mounted but unable to see files exist inside glusterfs volume

http://pastebin.com/06LrDBYD Here I have shared the log. Please refer. Thanks and regards Shyam On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Atin Mukherjee amukh...@redhat.com wrote: What error are you getting trying to access the files. Could you also share the client log file? ~Atin On 03/28/2015

Re: [Gluster-users] Unable to find the requested file. Please check the spelling and try again.

I'm sorry. I forgot to put error message. Here is the error message in dialog box: Unhandled error message: Error when getting information for file '/home/server/data': No such file or directory On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Shyam Deshmukh shyamdeshmukh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I have

[Gluster-users] Client is mounted but unable to see files exist inside glusterfs volume

Hi all, Greetings .. I tried to mounted volume. mount is successful. But files exist on mounted volume are not available to access in client local folder. Please tell me what could be possible error??? Thanks and regards Shyam ___ Gluster-users

[Gluster-users] Gluster peer status disconnected

-a863-e9e8c4e84710 State: Peer in Cluster (Disconnected) Hostname: gluster2 Uuid: 45ac276d-9e65-4e32-8abe-51f8ba0241ce State: Peer in Cluster (Disconnected) gluster@gluster1:~$ Thanks Shyam ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster peer status disconnected

, confirmed that daemon is running. and also as per iptables flush command.But it was not working. Finally I created new nodes in virtual box and created new server pool. Its working now. Thanks.. Shyam D. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Sweta Anandpara sanan...@redhat.com wrote: Forgot to include

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.11.2 (Short Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.11.2 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. We still carry a major issue that is reported in the release-notes as follows, - Expanding a gluster volume that is sharded may cause

[Gluster-users] Release 3.12: RC0 build is available for testing!

]. If it is deemed as a blocker add it to the release tracker (or just drop a note on the bug itself) [5]. Thanks, Jiffin and Shyam. [1] builds avaiable at: https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/3.12.0rc0/ [2] Signing key for the builds: https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.10.5 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.5 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. We are still awaiting feedback on a major issue that is reported in the release-notes as follows, all known issues resulting in this

Re: [Gluster-users] Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7

On 10/04/2017 06:17 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 09:44:44AM +, ismael mondiu wrote: Hello, I'd like to test if 3.10.6 version fixes the problem . I'm wondering which is the correct way to upgrade from 3.10.5 to 3.10.6. It's hard to find upgrade guides for a minor

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.10.6 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.6 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. We are still working on a further fix for the corruption issue when sharded volumes are rebalanced, details as below. * Expanding a

Re: [Gluster-users] Can I use 3.7.11 server with 3.10.5 client?

On 09/08/2017 01:32 PM, Serkan Çoban wrote: Any suggestions? On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Serkan Çoban wrote: Hi, Is it safe to use 3.10.5 client with 3.7.11 server with read-only data move operation? The normal upgrade, and hence tested, procedure is older

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss

*1024) = 892MB/sec Shyam On 09/07/2017 12:07 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote: It is sequential write with file size 2GB. Same behavior observed with 3.11.3 too. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com> wrote: On 09/06/2017 05:48 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote: Hi, Just d

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.10.5 vs 3.12.0 huge performance loss

equivalent to that to look at this further. I would like to ensure there are no evident performance regressions as you report. Shyam ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Re: [Gluster-users] Announcing GlusterFS release 3.12.0 (Long Term Maintenance)

at ways to improve that in the future. [1] https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/6/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.12/ On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com> wrote: This is a major Gluster release that includes, features and bug fixes. Notable feature high

[Gluster-users] Announcing GlusterFS release 3.12.0 (Long Term Maintenance)

This is a major Gluster release that includes, features and bug fixes. Notable feature highlights are, * Ability to mount sub-directories using the Gluster native protocol (FUSE) * Brick multiplexing enhancements that help scale to larger brick counts per node * Enhancements

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.11.3 (Short Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.11.3 (packages available at [1,2,3]). Release notes for the release can be found at [4]. ***Reminder Number One***: 3.11.3 is the last release of the 3.11 STM series. 3.11 will be EOL when 3.12 is released in a couple of

Re: [Gluster-users] 3.8 Upgrade to 3.10

o straight from 3.8 to 3.10? * Do I need to offline the volume first? The upgrade notes [1] covers this, in short an offline upgrade is not needed in your setup, as disperse is not a part of the stack. Shyam [1] 3.10 upgrade guide: https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Upgrade-Guide/upgra

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] Gluster documentation search

On 08/28/2017 07:14 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: Hello folks, I spend some time today mucking about trying to figure out how to make our documentation search a better experience. The short answer is, search kind of works now. Awesome! thank you. Long answer: mkdocs creates a client side file

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.12.2 : Scheduled for the 10th of October

after release tagging (or the release announcement for that matter). Thanks, Shyam ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.10.7 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.7 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. We are still working on a further fix for the corruption issue when sharded volumes are rebalanced, details as below. * Expanding a

Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] BoF - Gluster for VM store use case

. There are a fair number of users in the community who have this use-case and may have some interesting questions around the proposed method. Shyam ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Gluster-users] RIO scope in release 4.0 (Was: Request for Comments: Upgrades from 3.x to 4.0+)

compatibility concerns from a distribute layer perspective in 4.0. Thanks, Shyam ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Gluster-users] Announcing GlusterFS release 3.13.0 (Short Term Maintenance)

This is a major release that includes a range of features enhancing usability; enhancements to GFAPI for developers and a set of bug fixes. * Addition of summary option to the heal info CLI * Addition of checks for allowing lookups in AFR and removal of 'cluster.quorum-reads' volume option

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.10.8 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.8 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. We are still working on a further fix for the corruption issue when sharded volumes are rebalanced, details as below. * Expanding a

Re: [Gluster-users] Upgrading from Gluster 3.8 to 3.12

On 12/20/2017 01:01 AM, Hari Gowtham wrote: > Yes Atin. I'll take a look. Once we have a root cause and a way around, please document this in the upgrade procedure in our docs as well. That way future problems have a documented solution (outside of the lists as well). Thanks! > > On Wed, Dec

Re: [Gluster-users] Syntax for creating arbiter volumes in gluster 4.0

On 12/20/2017 05:14 AM, Ravishankar N wrote: > Hi, > > The existing syntax in the gluster CLI for creating arbiter volumes is > `gluster volume create replica 3 arbiter 1 ` . > It means (or at least intended to mean) that out of the 3 bricks, 1 > brick is the arbiter. > There has been some

[Gluster-users] Gluster release 3.12.10 (Long Term Maintenance) Canceled for 10th of May, 2018

, 2018. Thanks, Shyam On 04/30/2018 12:56 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster > 3.12.9 (packages available at [1]). > > Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. > > This release contains fixes for CVE-2018-1088

[Gluster-users] Release delays!

in the month of May (slated on the 20th and 30th) were canceled. Shyam ___ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.10.12 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.10.12 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. This release contains fixes for CVE-2018-1088 and CVE-2018-1112, among other fixes. Please use the release notes to check on the fix list.

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 3.12.9 (Long Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 3.12.9 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. This release contains fixes for CVE-2018-1088 and CVE-2018-1112, among other fixes. Please use the release notes to check on the fix list.

[Gluster-users] Announcing Gluster release 4.0.2 (Short Term Maintenance)

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 4.0.2 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. This release contains fixes for CVE-2018-1088 and CVE-2018-1112, among other fixes. Please use the release notes to check on the fix list.

  1   2   >