On 2020-06-09 10:21:31 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020, Niels Möller wrote:
>
> > Marc Glisse writes:
> >
> > > On Sat, 6 Jun 2020, Mihai Preda wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would rather suggest to support intmax_t and uintmax_t.
> > >
> > > That's one possibility for C (and C++,
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020, Niels Möller wrote:
Marc Glisse writes:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020, Mihai Preda wrote:
I would rather suggest to support intmax_t and uintmax_t.
That's one possibility for C (and C++, although it is a bit more
painful there), but not one that everyone agrees with. I think the
> On 6 Jun 2020, at 06:28, Mihai Preda wrote:
>
> At this point the C++ compiler on windows (where long is 32-bit)
> reports errors, see at the end. The problem is that the set of
> constructors does not include one taking a 64-bit integer:
>
> #define __GMPXX_DEFINE_ARITHMETIC_CONSTRUCTORS
