Torbjorn Granlund writes:
> Let's first decide if it is worth spending time on. Just because
> somebody writes a "compiler" doesn't mean taat we need to feed GMP to
> it...
I think it makes sense to have --disable-assembly disable *all* use of
assembly source files.
For configure.in hacks, aft
On 2012-06-20 21:26:18 +0200, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> Let's first decide if it is worth spending time on. Just because
> somebody writes a "compiler" doesn't mean taat we need to feed GMP to
> it...
>
> Does anybody really need to use tcc for compiling GMP?
Perhaps because of dependency. But
bodr...@mail.dm.unipi.it writes:
tmp-amd64call.s:120: error: unknown opcode 'movq'
...
Even with the "--disable-assembly" option given to configure, "make check"
is asking to the compiler to assemble a .s file. It didn't happen with the
"--host=none" option given to GMP-5.0 .
If you
This discussion begun on gmp-bugs, was moved to gmp-discuss... I reply to
gmp-devel to avoid confusions for the users, because the problem I've
found arise with the current head repository only.
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
>
> Not to remove it, but to make it *optional*, i.e. to have a fallback
>
