Re: increase mini-gmp base support to 62

"Marco Bodrato" writes: > But the proposed patch adds constants that enlarge (too much in my > opinion) both the source and the binary of this small-size implementation. I also prefer the conciser version without the large table. > I attach an alternative patch.

Re: mpn_sqrtrem{1,2}

Adrien Prost-Boucle writes: > Maybe the availability of SSE / AVX / NEON etc instruction sets can be > checked at compilation time? That's what configure (and its helper scripts) does. With --enable-fat, we also have runtime detection on certain systems. > The