ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
I think it makes sense to have --disable-assembly disable *all* use of
assembly source files.
Maybe. I suppose the file now in question is used only by
tests/devel/try for detecting ABI breaches. Compiler generated code
should not need such
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de writes:
But the failure mode is assembling assembler source - GMP should
arrange to not use the compiler driver to assemble but to call
an assembler directly for assembler source.
Are you volunteering
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de writes:
It was just a suggestion - if I'd implement it I would default to
the compiler driver for the assembler call but allow a different
assembler to be specified via configure.
That approach makes some sense to me. Assuming such a configure option
makes
Ciao,
Il Gio, 21 Giugno 2012 6:47 pm, bodr...@mail.dm.unipi.it ha scritto:
Il Mer, 20 Giugno 2012 9:54 pm, Niels Möller ha scritto:
For configure.in hacks, after a quick look I think what needs to be done
is to have --disable-assembly disable any setting of
HAVE_CALLING_CONVENTIONS (config.h
Ciao,
Il Mer, 20 Giugno 2012 9:54 pm, Niels Möller ha scritto:
I think it makes sense to have --disable-assembly disable *all* use of
assembly source files.
Agreed.
For configure.in hacks, after a quick look I think what needs to be done
is to have --disable-assembly disable any setting of
This discussion begun on gmp-bugs, was moved to gmp-discuss... I reply to
gmp-devel to avoid confusions for the users, because the problem I've
found arise with the current head repository only.
Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net writes:
Not to remove it, but to make it *optional*, i.e. to
bodr...@mail.dm.unipi.it writes:
tmp-amd64call.s:120: error: unknown opcode 'movq'
...
Even with the --disable-assembly option given to configure, make check
is asking to the compiler to assemble a .s file. It didn't happen with the
--host=none option given to GMP-5.0 .
If you have
On 2012-06-20 21:26:18 +0200, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
Let's first decide if it is worth spending time on. Just because
somebody writes a compiler doesn't mean taat we need to feed GMP to
it...
Does anybody really need to use tcc for compiling GMP?
Perhaps because of dependency. But I'm
Torbjorn Granlund t...@gmplib.org writes:
Let's first decide if it is worth spending time on. Just because
somebody writes a compiler doesn't mean taat we need to feed GMP to
it...
I think it makes sense to have --disable-assembly disable *all* use of
assembly source files.
For configure.in
