Torbjorn Granlund t...@gmplib.org writes:
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
Here are some comments on a few that stood out.
Thanks!
I think I'll reply in one mail per function (-group).
I didn't list __gmpn_add_n_sub_n as public since I consider it
experimental. It seemed
Ciao,
Il Dom, 3 Marzo 2013 7:13 pm, Torbjorn Granlund ha scritto:
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
I didn't list __gmpn_add_n_sub_n as public since I consider it
experimental. It seemed like a good idea, but I never managed to make
it faster, not even for the large
Torbjorn Granlund t...@gmplib.org writes:
Shouldn't be too hard.
I'd suggest to:
* Rewrite the C functions to accept carry-in, and of course rename to _nc.
* Provide macros (or inlines) for mpn_add_n (mpn_sub_n)
* Provide fall-back mpn_add_n (mpn_sub_n) for the library (needed for
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
As I understand it, that plan would imply that for assembly files
currently providing both _n and _nc, the _n entry point gets obsolete
That was not the idea, at least not for internal calls. It sometimes
have a cycle or two overhead.
It does
Torbjorn Granlund t...@gmplib.org writes:
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
As I understand it, that plan would imply that for assembly files
currently providing both _n and _nc, the _n entry point gets obsolete
That was not the idea, at least not for internal calls. It
