Re: [Gmsh] difference between gmsh svn nightly build

2017-03-13 Thread Benedikt Oswald
thanks very much! How can I specify tetrahedral meshing density using the OCC factory ? Greetings Benedikt Am 13.03.17 um 14:00 schrieb Christophe Geuzaine: >> On 13 Mar 2017, at 12:11, Benedikt Oswald wrote: >> >> Dear gmsh developers, >> >> there seems to be quite a different behavior with

Re: [Gmsh] difference between gmsh svn nightly build

2017-03-13 Thread Christophe Geuzaine
> On 13 Mar 2017, at 15:35, Benedikt Oswald wrote: > > thanks very much! > > How can I specify tetrahedral meshing density > > using the OCC factory ? Same as with .geo files: - globally - and/or at geometry vertices (with Point() or using Characteristic Length{}) - and/or using Fields PS:

Re: [Gmsh] difference between gmsh svn nightly build

2017-03-13 Thread Christophe Geuzaine
> On 13 Mar 2017, at 12:11, Benedikt Oswald wrote: > > Dear gmsh developers, > > there seems to be quite a different behavior with respect to certain > .geo files between > > the svn nightly builds of 27.2.2017 and 13.3.2017. I have attached the > .geo files. > > Which version is more relevan

[Gmsh] difference between gmsh svn nightly build

2017-03-13 Thread Benedikt Oswald
Dear gmsh developers, there seems to be quite a different behavior with respect to certain .geo files between the svn nightly builds of 27.2.2017 and 13.3.2017. I have attached the .geo files. Which version is more relevant ? Thanks & greetings, Benedikt