Thanks, I'll check it out.
Best,
Nikhil
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020, 12:53 PM Christophe Geuzaine
wrote:
>
>
> > On 23 Nov 2020, at 11:19, Nikhil Vaidya
> wrote:
> >
> > I changed my geometry slightly, and the negative jacobians problem has
> returned. Is there som
lease let the list know if
> > Try the high-order mesh optimizer: "-optimize_ho" on the command line.
> fixed the problem,
> Stephen
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Christophe Geuzaine"
> > To: "Nikhil Vaidya"
> >
Hi Christophe,
Your suggestion solved my problem. Thanks!
Best,
Nikhil
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, 2:19 PM Christophe Geuzaine
wrote:
>
>
> > On 4 Sep 2020, at 13:49, Nikhil Vaidya wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a geometry for which 1st order tetrahedral me
Hello,
I have a geometry for which 1st order tetrahedral meshing works fine (with
no negative jacobians). For the 2nd order case, I get a few negative
jacobians. This problem does not go away even when I try to regularize the
mesh or reduce mesh sizes in certain regions with small geometric
and tetrahedra in my output mesh file?
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Jeremy Theler <jer...@seamplex.com> wrote:
> Define physical entities containing only volumes. See
> http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Elementary-vs-physical-entities
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 16
and tetrahedra in my output mesh file?
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Jeremy Theler <jer...@seamplex.com> wrote:
> Define physical entities containing only volumes. See
> http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Elementary-vs-physical-entities
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 16
