Re: [Gmsh] too slow coherence function

Thank you for your reply, I will try it. Sorry for the latest line​ in my previous post "Salome is written in python which is no faster than C++ so ... " because it might sounded judgemental which was not my intention. kind regards Andrew tsiantis 2016-08-28 17:32 GMT+03:00 Christophe

Re: [Gmsh] too slow coherence function

> On 28 Aug 2016, at 13:57, andrew wrote: > > Hi, > > Thank you for your response. > > I have tried the suggestion you made but this way I don't get the internal > surfaces which I need. The surface ​mesh is constructed correctly but as you > can see from the first image

Re: [Gmsh] too slow coherence function

Andrew, The problem actually seems to come from the way you define the surface: can you regenerate your geometry script after - removing all the zero-area line loops (e.g. "Line Loop(6) = {5, -5};") - removing these loops from the definition of the main surface (i.e. simply have "Plane

Re: [Gmsh] too slow coherence function

> On 19 Aug 2016, at 21:34, andrew wrote: > > ​Hi, > > I try to create a 3d mesh from an extruded 2d mesh. The mesh is a simple box > but with cuts in it of zero width. The geometry is created ok and the meshing > even when I have 2000-3000 cuts is done in less than a few