ciated with elementary geometrical entity "-1":
> this is invalid, as you should have at least as many elementary geometrical
> entities as physical groups (which group elementary entities).
>
> Christophe
>
>
>> On 10 Nov 2018, at 06:48, Praveen C wrote:
>>
Hello
Trying to open this file with latest gmsh (mac osx binary from gmsh website)
https://github.com/mrklein/p3d2gmsh/blob/master/tests/n0012.msh
I dont get any error message but the mesh is not displayed also.
What could be the issue ? It seems to display with some older versions of gmsh.
Dear all
I was using “Compound Line” in some cases which is now removed.
My use was something like this
Compound Line(10) = {5,6};
Compound Line(11) = {7,8};
Transfinite Line{10,11} = na;
and full example is attached.
Now I have to use “Compound Curve” but this does not create a new curve
Thanks a lot. The dev snapshot works for me.
Best regards
praveen
> On 19-Oct-2019, at 1:46 AM, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
>
> That's indeed a use-case that the new compound meshing constraints do not
> cover.
>
> I have just added a new "Compound Spline/BSpline" command so that you can
>
We have used this in our code, though I did not implement it, so I dont know
the details.
Here is sample code
// get gmsh boundary tag
PetscInt bdry_tag;
ierr = DMGetLabelValue(dm, "Face Sets", face_no, _tag);
CHKERRQ(ierr);
Best
praveen
> On
Another way is explained here
https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/2019-May/038519.html
<https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/2019-May/038519.html>
Best
praveen
> On 03-Dec-2020, at 6:21 PM, Praveen C wrote:
>
> We have used this in our code, though I di
