> On 25 Jul 2019, at 00:23, Martin Kraska
> wrote:
>
> Hi Christophe,
>
> Thank you for the explanation and for making a nice example based on the
> problem case.
> I would appreciate a link to the related page of my CalculiX example
> collection
>
>
Hi Martin,
The "little bit of work" has been done to automate the procedure so that
compounds can now be used for high-order meshes. In short:
- With Mesh.CompoundClassify=1, triangles are magically reclassified on the
original surfaces. This is great for keeping e.g. Physical groups
> On 23 Jul 2019, at 09:13, Martin Kraska
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> thanks for your immediate response. Yet adding the compound constraint to
> surfaces 21 and 22 doesn't solve the problem. The virtual topology is still
> ignored.
No, with the latest dev snapshot this works perfectly:
***
If anyone is interested, that very same case can be solved
directly from Onshape in less than 30 seconds:
https://youtu.be/iure4rn6GRg
In a couple of weeks I will add the possibility to download the .step
and .geo to modify it offline.
Regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon,
> On 22 Jul 2019, at 21:47, Martin Kraska
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> in the attached script I try to mesh a step part using virtual topology
> (trying to update the example
> https://github.com/mkraska/CalculiX-Examples/tree/master/CAD/OnshapeTutorial )
> I see that I have to use a new
Hello,
in the attached script I try to mesh a step part using virtual topology (trying
to update the example [
https://github.com/mkraska/CalculiX-Examples/tree/master/CAD/OnshapeTutorial |
https://github.com/mkraska/CalculiX-Examples/tree/master/CAD/OnshapeTutorial ]
)
I see that I have to
