Dear All
I've an assembly with sub-parts i.e Physical groups, and if I go to
"visualization -> List browser" :
1) I can see the groups but if I choose one (+ apply), none of the other
groups are hidden -> am I using a wrong method ?
2) in some cases (specifically in a post-processing file
hi
There're only triangles in your mesh (see screenshoot) that is what gmsh
does by default (execept if you recombine)
Paul
Le 2017-07-11 00:14, César Pablo Camusso a écrit :
> Dear partners,
> I want a mesh with only triangles, but I get also quads.
> It is a 2d geometry.
> How can I
Hi
What do you mean exactly?
If you are speaking about 1D + 2D (tria/quad) + 3D (hex,tet, prism,
pyra) : of course you can
Paul
Le 2017-07-09 10:20, Julia Fischer a écrit :
> HI List Members,
>
> I was wondering , is it possible to have element of different type in one
> mesh ?
>
>
Erratum on my previous email: I forgot that even if I remove the .opt
file, the caption still shows positive values ... so ?
Paul
Le 2017-07-18 17:25, paul.carr...@free.fr a écrit :
> First of all thanks for the answer:
>
> a) "there are none defined in the submitted .msh file"
>
> In my
Hi
The list of topics I've to deal with is increasing when I see the
capabilities of gmsh to post-process results, so the amount of question
as well consequently
The main challenge will be to "automatize" the postprocessing process in
a .opt file rather than "clicking" dozens of time,
Hi (again)
I'm trying to open a gmsh I'm working on, on my laptop under Ubuntu
16.04 LTS, but gmsh crashes with the following message : "Instruction
non permise (core dumped)" i.e. unautorized instruction.
It is not an issue coming from gmsh a properly speaking (since it works
under
Hi Guillaume,
Yes I played with such options, but strange to have 7 intervals when
asking for 10, and to note a different mapping when exporting to the
old/legacy .pos format (but in that case the bounds min/max differ)
I need to dig into the documentation to see if it's possible to write
"in
you're right
it's a wrong "good example" but I've noticed intreresting (other) things
Thanks for your time
Paul
Le 2017-06-22 10:50, Christophe Geuzaine a écrit :
> Paul,
>
> The problem is that your field is not linear on the hex; to see it,
> you'll need to go the the adaptive
Hi ,
I'm performing (first) tests in order to familiarize with gmsh
post-processingformat; still trying to understand some tags, but I've
been noticing visual differences in the mapping.
In the attachment I provide the file (basic 20 nodes hexaedron) and
nodal values:
- using the original fomat,
please find the information's after doinf ldd
Paul
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7ffe3fcf5000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x7fd2d6cd9000)
libGL.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/mesa/libGL.so.1
(0x7fd2d6a65000)
libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXrender.so.1
I don't think, but there's different ways to create your own interface
:-)
Le 2017-06-23 12:24, Michael Groß a écrit :
> Dear Christophe,
>
> it is possible to read a bacon .dat-file for Samcef into gmesh.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Michael
>
>
yes I confirm it works now after the upgrade
Many thanks
Paul
Le 2017-06-23 06:53, m.schoen...@e-und-a.ch a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> this binary works perfect!
>
> Best regards,
>
> ppa. Marc C. Schöning
> Dr.-Ing.
> Leiter Forschung & Entwicklung / Head of R
> Mitglied der
Hi Jean-Pierre,
Let me summarizing (as a reminder for me)
* For a deformed mesh
* Tools > options > View[x] > Visibility > 'fields' scroll bar >
choose 'force vector'
* Tools > options > view[x] > General > 'range mode' scroll bar >
choose 'per step'
* Tools >
Hi Jean-François,
Thanks for the information's ; even if post-processing is a part of gmsh
capabilities, I've been looking for a "light" but accurate
post-processor to share results with my colleagues : gmsh is fully
adapted for that purpose
"Y'a plus qu'à "
Thanks
Paul
Le 2017-06-17
Hi All
I'm thinking in interfacing a FEA code to Gmsh for post-processing
results ; for that topic the documentation is speaking about an old file
format (legacy).
Where can I find the right format?
Is all the element supported (from shell to volumic elements - 1rst to
2nd order ones)?
Hi All,
I'm using gmsh to postprocess finite element results, but for huge
models (or if I want to postprocess several physical quantities), I've
ever been confronted to limitations (mainly memory issues).
Recently I started to work with hdf5 libraries (or netcdf ones which is
based on the
Dear All,
I would like to perform tests on the Interpolation schemes (see
post-processing matrices in the gmsh pdf doc: page 75 an example is
provided for a the first order quad).
Are the other matrices accessibles for the different elements (1rst and
2nd order)?
Thanks
17 matches
Mail list logo