Re: [gmx-users] problem with the max number of atom in charge group

2007-06-13 Thread David van der Spoel
Nicolas Sapay wrote: Hello everybody, I'm trying to use a DPPC bilayers with charges from the Jacob Sonne et al. study (Biophys J., 2007). The problem is that the authors have defined a single group for the whole DPPC molecule. This allow them to define new accurate charge for the head group

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Warning when using both LJ and Buckingham non-bonded interaction

2007-06-13 Thread David van der Spoel
WU Yanbin wrote: Hi, Everybody, And I found that if this simulation is on gromacs3.3, the warning becomes error. Yours Sincerely, indeed, since this is not implemented. you canhowever use table potentials that differe betw

Re: [gmx-users] HB lifetime in g_hbond

2007-06-13 Thread David van der Spoel
Patricia Soto Becerra wrote: Hi, I have a question regarding the calculation of hydrogen bond lifetimes in g_hbond: Line 1094 of gmx_hbond.c v 1.16.2.11 2006/04/02 (which is equivalent to line 1121 of gmx_hbond.c v 1.28 2006/08/30) reads: t = hb->time[i] - hb->time[0] - 0.5*dt; leading to

Re: [gmx-users] Regarding scalling factor of cluster and installation in cluster

2007-06-13 Thread Mark Abraham
naga raju wrote: Dear gmx users, I have some problem regarding scalling factor of cluster. Here I have given cluster specifications, installation procedure, i request you go through query and suggest me. Here is the system specifications: Master node: Intel Pentium 4, 3.0 GHz with 64HT 800

[gmx-users] Re: Warning when using both LJ and Buckingham non-bonded interaction

2007-06-13 Thread WU Yanbin
Hi, Everybody, And I found that if this simulation is on gromacs3.3, the warning becomes error. Yours Sincerely, WU Yanbin Message: 7 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:35:42 -0500 From: "WU Yanbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [gmx-users]

[gmx-users] Regarding scalling factor of cluster and installation in cluster

2007-06-13 Thread naga raju
Dear gmx users, I have some problem regarding scalling factor of cluster. Here I have given cluster specifications, installation procedure, i request you go through query and suggest me. Here is the system specifications: Master node: Intel Pentium 4, 3.0 GHz with 64HT 800 MHz FSB/2

Re: [gmx-users] Warning when using both LJ and Buckingham non-bonded interaction

2007-06-13 Thread Mark Abraham
WU Yanbin wrote: Hi, When I use both LJ and Buckingham non-bonded interaction in my topology file, specially like the following: [ nonbond_params ] ; ij func c6 c12 OW OW 1 ... ; ij

Re: [gmx-users] problem with the max number of atom in charge group

2007-06-13 Thread Mark Abraham
Nicolas Sapay wrote: Hello everybody, I'm trying to use a DPPC bilayers with charges from the Jacob Sonne et al. study (Biophys J., 2007). The problem is that the authors have defined a single group for the whole DPPC molecule. This allow them to define new accurate charge for the head group

[gmx-users] Warning when using both LJ and Buckingham non-bonded interaction

2007-06-13 Thread WU Yanbin
Hi, When I use both LJ and Buckingham non-bonded interaction in my topology file, specially like the following: [ nonbond_params ] ; ij func c6 c12 OW OW 1 ... ; ij func a

[gmx-users] problem with the max number of atom in charge group

2007-06-13 Thread Nicolas Sapay
Hello everybody, I'm trying to use a DPPC bilayers with charges from the Jacob Sonne et al. study (Biophys J., 2007). The problem is that the authors have defined a single group for the whole DPPC molecule. This allow them to define new accurate charge for the head group atoms and the first at

[gmx-users] HB lifetime in g_hbond

2007-06-13 Thread Patricia Soto Becerra
Hi, I have a question regarding the calculation of hydrogen bond lifetimes in g_hbond: Line 1094 of gmx_hbond.c v 1.16.2.11 2006/04/02 (which is equivalent to line 1121 of gmx_hbond.c v 1.28 2006/08/30) reads: t = hb->time[i] - hb->time[0] - 0.5*dt; leading to the time series 1, 3, 5,.. th

[gmx-users] a question about output virial

2007-06-13 Thread Lu Lanyuan
Hello, From the mailinglist archive It is said the scalar virial from the g_energy vir=(1/3)*(vir(xx)+vir(yy)+vir(zz))=-0.5*sum(iinteractions are pairwised. I tried to verify this by using the relation PV=(2/3)*E(kin)+(1/3)*sum(iAll instantaneous virial, kinetic energy, pressure and volume can b

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs tools mistakenly change the name of atoms in coordinate files

2007-06-13 Thread Robert Johnson
I could understand if it was doing this within pdb2gmx or something that was constructing a topology file. I'm observing this behavior when using editconf to simply convert files to another format or apply box dimensions etc. Anyway, I submitted a bugzilla about it. This isn't such a big problem -

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs tools mistakenly change the name of atoms in coordinate files

2007-06-13 Thread Yang Ye
On 6/14/2007 1:14 AM, Erik Lindahl wrote: Hi Robert, On Jun 13, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Robert Johnson wrote: These are all fine points. However, the question I'm asking is why do Gromacs tools change atoms named OXT in PDB files to O2? Of course there are always workarounds i.e. just simply change

[gmx-users] make-hole

2007-06-13 Thread Chris Neale
I want to make hole in center of popc bilayer . how ?can i do it by make-hole program?(cx,cy=?) You can read the manual. Once you unpack the files you will have README.hole That file contains installation instructions (gromacs-3.1.4 only) and a link to usage instructions. _

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs tools mistakenly change the name of atoms in coordinate files

2007-06-13 Thread David van der Spoel
Robert Johnson wrote: These are all fine points. However, the question I'm asking is why do Gromacs tools change atoms named OXT in PDB files to O2? Of course there are always workarounds i.e. just simply change the atom name in the coordinate file. However, I was wondering if anyone knew why thi

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs tools mistakenly change the name of atoms in coordinate files

2007-06-13 Thread Erik Lindahl
Hi Robert, On Jun 13, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Robert Johnson wrote: These are all fine points. However, the question I'm asking is why do Gromacs tools change atoms named OXT in PDB files to O2? Of course there are always workarounds i.e. just simply change the atom name in the coordinate file. Howev

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs tools mistakenly change the name of atoms in coordinate files

2007-06-13 Thread Robert Johnson
These are all fine points. However, the question I'm asking is why do Gromacs tools change atoms named OXT in PDB files to O2? Of course there are always workarounds i.e. just simply change the atom name in the coordinate file. However, I was wondering if anyone knew why this happened. I suppose I

Re: [gmx-users] re:multi problem again

2007-06-13 Thread Mark Abraham
Andrei Neamtu wrote: Dear Mark, Thank you for your reply! I thought that maybe the accessibility were the problem. I don't figure how to set the working directory of say node 1 to my current working directory on node 0. I setup node 1 to be able to access node 0 through ssh with no password

[gmx-users] Re: gmx-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 29

2007-06-13 Thread linfu
>It's hard to work out your problem, but it sounds like you haven't read >manual section 3.2 yet. Please do so, and get back to us. > >Mark Thanks Mark! I will check manual. I am really sorry for bothering! BEST REGARDS ___ gmx-users mailing list

[gmx-users] re:multi problem

2007-06-13 Thread Andrei Neamtu
Thanks a lot Mark and Ye, I will try both alternatives! Andrei ___ gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting! Please don'

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs tools mistakenly change the name of atoms in coordinate files

2007-06-13 Thread TJ Piggot
Hi, I think that the terminal oxygen atoms should not be named OXT for the amber forcefields but rather OC1 and OC2. To check this look in the top folder at the ffamberXX.rtp file. Hope this helps Tom --On Tuesday, June 12, 2007 15:30 -0400 Robert Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hell

Re: [gmx-users] re:multi problem again

2007-06-13 Thread Yang Ye
Setting up a NFS shall be handy. On 6/13/2007 5:13 PM, Andrei Neamtu wrote: Dear Mark, Thank you for your reply! I thought that maybe the accessibility were the problem. I don't figure how to set the working directory of say node 1 to my current working directory on node 0. I setup node 1 to

Re: [gmx-users] re:multi problem again

2007-06-13 Thread David van der Spoel
Andrei Neamtu wrote: Dear Mark, Thank you for your reply! I thought that maybe the accessibility were the problem. I don't figure how to set the working directory of say node 1 to my current working directory on node 0. I setup node 1 to be able to access node 0 through ssh with no password

[gmx-users] re:multi problem again

2007-06-13 Thread Andrei Neamtu
Dear Mark, Thank you for your reply! I thought that maybe the accessibility were the problem. I don't figure how to set the working directory of say node 1 to my current working directory on node 0. I setup node 1 to be able to access node 0 through ssh with no password but the problem rem

[gmx-users] make-hole

2007-06-13 Thread mahbubeh zarrabi
Dear all I want to make hole in center of popc bilayer . how can i do it by make-hole program?(cx,cy=?) thanks 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. http://

Re: [gmx-users] question about PBC and link cell based cutoff method

2007-06-13 Thread Mark Abraham
linfu wrote: > Dear GMX community! > > I have question about PBC and link cell based cutoff method. > > (1) > for example one water molecule,if only H atom of one water molecule > move out of box, however, O atom are still in the box. does this H atom > will need to be image back to the box throu

[gmx-users] question about PBC and link cell based cutoff method

2007-06-13 Thread linfu
Dear GMX community! I have question about PBC and link cell based cutoff method. (1) for example one water molecule,if only H atom of one water molecule move out of box, however, O atom are still in the box. does this H atom will need to be image back to the box through PBC,or just ignore it unt

Re: [gmx-users] multi problem

2007-06-13 Thread Mark Abraham
Andrei Neamtu wrote: Dear gmx users, I have problems in running a simulation on several nodes using the -multi option: I make the .tpr files for different temperatures (I want to use the REMD code) grompp -f param0.mdp -po param0.out.mdp -c conf.gro -p topol.top -o sim0.tpr grompp -f par

[gmx-users] multi problem

2007-06-13 Thread Andrei Neamtu
Dear gmx users, I have problems in running a simulation on several nodes using the -multi option: I make the .tpr files for different temperatures (I want to use the REMD code) grompp -f param0.mdp -po param0.out.mdp -c conf.gro -p topol.top -o sim0.tpr grompp -f param1.mdp -po param1.out.m