Mark Abraham wrote:
Santanu Ch wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for the documentation of GROMACS trajectory output
file format and
GROMACS .tpr file format. We have our own MD simualation program which
is based on CHARMM.
We would like to make this program output simulation trajectories in
nikhil damle wrote:
Hi,
We can use max 4 coloumns for naming atoms. But .rtp file has 5
coloumn atom names (AO1PG etc) That i modified to 4 letter name. But now
the error is atom N not found in residue 1ATP while combining tdb and rtp
pdb2gmx tries to cap termini of peptides
Dear All,
Our colleges asked me to do some rather simple MD of the organic-silicone
compounds (-Si-Si-Si- backbone with organic radicals), but it appeared to be
not so simple because of the force field. Does anybody know about parameters
for such systems, which are adapted for GROMACS? I've
Hi Semen,
When confronted with Si-Si-Si and radicals in the same sentence, I
don't get comforted and definitely wouldn't characterize it as 'rather
simmple' ;)
There seem to be quite a number of publications referring to MD of
Si-Si systems though. Try googling a bit, or try Web of Science; gives
Hi,
I already answered this mail, but somehow for a small fraction of
the mails I reply to hotmail replies to the user, not to the list.
Here is my answer:
You can't do this easily.
The current maximum for the number of parameters per interaction is 6.
If you really want to, you could increase
nbsp;Dear all
nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; I attach 8 carbonyl groups onto a carbon
nanotube (CNT). Each carbonyl group is considered as a residue named Car and
each carbon atomnbsp;in the CNT is considered as a residue named Gr1. In the
mdp file, the freezegrps are Gr1 and Car, and the
toby10222...@sina.com wrote:
Dear all
I attach 8 carbonyl groups onto a carbon nanotube (CNT). Each
carbonyl group is considered as a residue named Car and each carbon
atom in the CNT is considered as a residue named Gr1. In the mdp file,
the freezegrps are Gr1 and Car, and the
Hi! I'm a postgraduate student from Malaysia and currently facing energy
minimization problem for my membrane system.
I'm trying to perform energy minimization for an empty POPC membrane with
position restraint on the lipid. Minimization stop due to inf Fmax. And I
noticed that in the log file as
Thanks a lot for kind help. I reached till grompp before minimizing energy of
the system where I received an error msg as Invalid order for directive
defaults: filename; line x !!! what is the meaning of this
error ? Is it something to do with path variable problem or
Dear all
nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; I attach 8 carbonyl groups onto a
carbon nanotube (CNT). Each carbonyl group is considered as a residue named
Car and each carbon atomnbsp;in the CNT is considered as a residue named
Gr1. In the mdp file, the freezegrps are Gr1 and Car, and the
nikhil damle wrote:
Thanks a lot for kind help. I reached till grompp before minimizing
energy of the system where I received an error msg as Invalid order for
directive defaults: filename; line x !!! what is
the meaning of this error ? Is it something to do with path
Bing Bing wrote:
Hi! I'm a postgraduate student from Malaysia and currently facing energy
minimization problem for my membrane system.
I'm trying to perform energy minimization for an empty POPC membrane
with position restraint on the lipid. Minimization stop due to inf Fmax.
And I noticed
Hi,
This is actually not (yet) documented.
0Z is the Z-coordinate of group 0.
1dZ is the the Z-coordinate of group 1 minus the one of group 0.
Berk
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:54:37 +0200
From: ilona.bal...@bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] pullx.xvg
Dear Berk,
Thanks for the quick reply. That leads me to my next questions:
*I used the whole N and C residues for pulling. Is there any way of
reconstructing the values for the single atoms? Or do you recommend
only to pull N and C in the first place?
*What does the reference group actually
Hi!
I am a very beginner, trying to make some dynamics of a protein in
a water box, after doing some (web) tutorials. I googled first for this
(possibly simple) error, found one reference, but cannot see it,
possibly because the gromacs site is under changes.
I ran pdb2gmx and editconf.
ThanksTsjerk, Google is definitely our best friend :) However, digging for
parameters and testing the funny mixed force field is not justified in this
case - the project is small as well as the amount of financing :) So, I whould
be very grateful if somebody could point me to the ready-to-use
iulek wrote:
Hi!
I am a very beginner, trying to make some dynamics of a protein in a
water box, after doing some (web) tutorials. I googled first for this
(possibly simple) error, found one reference, but cannot see it,
possibly because the gromacs site is under changes.
I ran
Hi Justin,
I've tried with no restraint and the minimization stopped at the same time.
I actually suspect that the restraint is not working at all. My top file is
as below:-
#include ffG53a6_lipid.itp
#include popc.itp
#ifdef POSRES
#include posres_popc.itp
#endif
#ifdef FLEX_SPC
#include
For parallel processing is it possible to use the system connected to the
local area network something like clustering the system for simulation.
plz suggest me so that i can use my resources for faster simulation.
thanks
AKALABYA BISSOYI
N.I.T.Rourkela.
Thanks for replying.
Humm..., maybe I see now. As a beginner I intended to keep all files
produced and better inspect what happens in sequence, but I did not want
to use the conventional renaming. But it seems that for the topology
file, the common procedure is to keep always one only
* Semen Esilevsky yesi...@yahoo.com [2009-06-23 06:06:58 -0700]:
ThanksTsjerk, Google is definitely our best friend :) However, digging for
parameters and testing the funny mixed force field is not justified in this
case - the project is small as well as the amount of financing :) So, I
Bing Bing wrote:
Hi Justin,
I've tried with no restraint and the minimization stopped at the same
time. I actually suspect that the restraint is not working at all. My
top file is as below:-
#include ffG53a6_lipid.itp
#include popc.itp
#ifdef POSRES
#include posres_popc.itp
#endif
#ifdef
iulek wrote:
Thanks for replying.
Humm..., maybe I see now. As a beginner I intended to keep all files
produced and better inspect what happens in sequence, but I did not want
to use the conventional renaming. But it seems that for the topology
file, the common procedure is to keep
Thanks for reply.
I've used editconf to define the box by issuing :-
editconf -f popc.pdb -o popc_box.gro -c -d 1.0 -bt cubic
Is this the correct way of using editconf?
And with this i proceed with grompp with the mdp file from previous email
followed by mdrun
Actually the restraint is
OK till here done ! the pdb file generated for EM should have ATP molecule
@proper position as input .top file has the ATP.itp included. It did not have.
If I do -ci it would randomly replace the solvent. I want ATP @ its proper
location. how do i do this ?
Hi,
Everything depends on what you want to accomplish, which you
do not write.
I don't see why you would want to look at single atoms.
Since you pull on COM's, only the COM coordinates are relevant.
If you want to look at single atoms, simply store them in the xtc file.
If you have only two
Bing Bing wrote:
Thanks for reply.
I've used editconf to define the box by issuing :-
editconf -f popc.pdb -o popc_box.gro -c -d 1.0 -bt cubic
Is this the correct way of using editconf?
This would be appropriate for a protein, but not a membrane. What you're doing
is defining a layer of
nikhil damle wrote:
OK till here done ! the pdb file generated for EM should have ATP
molecule @proper position as input .top file has the ATP.itp included.
It did not have. If I do -ci it would randomly replace the solvent. I
want ATP @ its proper location. how do i do this ?
nikhil damle wrote:
OK till here done ! the pdb file generated for EM should have ATP
molecule @proper position as input .top file has the ATP.itp included.
It did not have. If I do -ci it would randomly replace the solvent. I
want ATP @ its proper location. how do i do this ?
Like I implied
akalabya bissoyi wrote:
For parallel processing is it possible to use the system connected to
the local area network something like clustering the system for simulation.
plz suggest me so that i can use my resources for faster simulation.
Yes it's possible, but you will not scale to more than
Dear all,
I want to impose a homogeneous static magnetic field on a solution. I just
wonder if the gromacs can do it, anyway? I believe gromacs can. However, could
anyone give me some suggestions to do it?
Thanks a lot!
___
风 大 wrote:
Dear all,
I want to impose a homogeneous static magnetic field on a solution. I
just wonder if the gromacs can do it, anyway? I believe gromacs can.
However, could anyone give me some suggestions to do it?
This is not implemented. I assume you would want to add a Lorentz force?
Hello everyone,
this is my very first post on GROMACS mailing list, so please apologize if my
question seems very simple.
Here is my problem... I ran a calculation using GROMACS 4.0.3 and this command
line:
mpirun -np 32 mdrun -s prot_md.tpr -c prot_md.gro -g md.log -e md.edr -o
prot_md.trr
Jérôme Baffreau wrote:
Hello everyone,
this is my very first post on GROMACS mailing list, so please apologize
if my question seems very simple.
Here is my problem... I ran a calculation using GROMACS 4.0.3 and this
command line:
mpirun -np 32 mdrun -s prot_md.tpr -c prot_md.gro -g
Hi,
Allow me to be the first to archive a message with negative index.
I ask for an index file:
make_ndx_s -f ???.pdb -o ???.ndx
and specify:
a AG
to select all the silver atoms into a group.
The index file then clearly numbers and lists the atoms: all in [
system ], again all atom numbers in
Sorry to post again,
But I meant to say that for atom indexing I looked using gmxdump:
gmxdump_s -s ???.tpr -f ???.pdb -nr
and found only indexing starting at zero; e.g
atom[0]={name=AG}
Cheers,
Chris Rowan
University of Victoria
2009/6/23 Christopher Rowan chriskro...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Christopher Rowan wrote:
Hi,
Allow me to be the first to archive a message with negative index.
I ask for an index file:
make_ndx_s -f ???.pdb -o ???.ndx
and specify:
a AG
to select all the silver atoms into a group.
The index file then clearly numbers and lists the atoms: all in [
system ],
I do not know such effect although work with the 'freeze' option for a
number of years in many gromacs versions.
Are you sure that the numbers of the atoms in your ndx file are the same as
in the corresponding residues? I suggest that you should look for a problem
there.
Do the atoms move only
Hi!
Thanks for your suggestion on the tutorial. I will try it out.
I actually tried to use the starting structure without going through
editconf and alteration but it failed. Here's the error:
ERROR: The cut-off length is longer than half the shortest box vector or
longer than the smallest box
39 matches
Mail list logo