Re: [gmx-users] Reg: Running gromacs on a condor cluster

2010-05-04 Thread Mark Abraham
On 3/05/2010 7:55 AM, Florian Dommert wrote: On 30.04.2010, at 16:04, Esztermann, Ansgar wrote: On Apr 30, 2010, at 14:46 , Rohit Farmer wrote: Hi everyone.. I just made a small two node condor cluster and was trying to run gromacs on it ... so i used the vanilla environment and placed

[gmx-users] Check out my photos on Facebook

2010-05-04 Thread Di Cheng
Hi, I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and events and I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you need to join Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own profile. Thanks, Di To sign up for Facebook, follow the link below:

[gmx-users] electro-static potential energy after minimization

2010-05-04 Thread abdullah ahmed
Hello everyone, I have two protein structures, and the insides of both are not exposed to water. One structure contains two oppositely charges residues (GLU and LYS) facing each other. The second structure contains a GLU residue only. Upon minimization I had expected the coloumb energies of

Re: [gmx-users] electro-static potential energy after minimization

2010-05-04 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
abdullah ahmed wrote: Hello everyone, I have two protein structures, and the insides of both are not exposed to water. One structure contains two oppositely charges residues (GLU and LYS) facing each other. The second structure contains a GLU residue only. Upon minimization I had expected

RE: [gmx-users] electro-static potential energy after minimization

2010-05-04 Thread abdullah ahmed
Thank you for your reply, However, I can not use MD. I would simply like to ask whether I am correct in assuming that the minimized energies of the two structures should be very different. Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 08:41:15 -0400 From: jalem...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re:

Re: [gmx-users] electro-static potential energy after minimization

2010-05-04 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
abdullah ahmed wrote: Thank you for your reply, However, I can not use MD. I would simply like to ask whether I am correct in assuming that the minimized energies of the two structures should be very different. What exactly are you measuring? The Coulombic energy of the system? If so,

re: [gmx-users] electro-static potential energy after minimization

2010-05-04 Thread abdullah ahmed
The charged residues are on the inside of the structure, and so are not affected by the solvent. There are also no other charged residues in the structure. Furthermore, the structure is quite small 22 (residues). So I am still tempted to say that the coloumbic energy of the system should be

re: [gmx-users] electro-static potential energy after minimization

2010-05-04 Thread Jared James Thompson
Do single-point MM/PBSA calculations. That's an energy value. But they may or may not be accurate. Energy values as you put them are not simple and you may need to run a simulation in order to obtain a proper ensemble. Such a simulation is not for refining the structure, it's to obtain an

Re: [gmx-users] electro-static potential energy after minimization

2010-05-04 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
abdullah ahmed wrote: The charged residues are on the inside of the structure, and so are not affected by the solvent. There are also no other charged residues in the structure. Furthermore, the structure is quite small 22 (residues). So I am still tempted to say that the coloumbic energy of

Re: [gmx-users] electro-static potential energy after minimization

2010-05-04 Thread Mark Abraham
On 5/05/2010 12:27 AM, abdullah ahmed wrote: The charged residues are on the inside of the structure, and so are not affected by the solvent. There are also no other charged residues in the structure. Furthermore, the structure is quite small 22 (residues). So I am still tempted to say that the

[gmx-users] Interaction energy

2010-05-04 Thread ANINDITA GAYEN
Dear all,     I have simulated a small peptide (+2 charge at pH=7) in water. Then i calculate the interaction energy using energy_grps = Protein SOL. The value of different energy terms are as follows:

Re: [gmx-users] make_edi, g_covar -nofit

2010-05-04 Thread Carsten Kutzner
Hi Vijaya, please check out the newest 4.0 version from the git release-4-0-patches branch. The make_edi problem should be fixed there. Regards, Carsten On Apr 26, 2010, at 11:19 PM, vijaya subramanian wrote: Hi I checked again with Gromacs 4.0.7 and I find that I have a problem with

[gmx-users] ADP topologies for OPLS

2010-05-04 Thread Ernesto Andres Román
Hi ! I am a newby on gromacs. Ive run dynamics of an ATP binding domain without ligand, but now, as the crystal structure with the bound ADP is published, I would like to see its dynamics. However as I started, I realized that topologies of ADP and ATP are not present in OPLS .itp file. Did

[gmx-users] PMF profile using g_wham with pull_geometry = distance for ion channel

2010-05-04 Thread Thomas Piggot
Hi, I am trying to construct a PMF profile for a phosphate ion passing through a membrane protein using umbrella sampling with GROMACS 4.0.5. I have performed the umbrella sampling simulations using the following mdp options and I am now attempting to construct the PMF using g_wham. ; Pull

[gmx-users] Many-Core CPU/GPU Summer School (With NVIDIA Developers)

2010-05-04 Thread Nuno Micaelo
Dear all I would like to draw your attention to this Summer School on GPU programming. The Summer School in e-Science with Many-Core CPU/GPU Processors is planned for the 3rd week of June in Braga, Portugal, and is the first course in Europe given by two NVIDIA senior members and a Professor

[gmx-users] Questions about parameters

2010-05-04 Thread Warren Gallin
I have been working through some sample problems and now I am at the stage where I need to settle on a consistent setup for simulation of short peptides in aqueous solution. I've been through the documentation repeatedly, but there are a couple things on which I am unclear. 1) I am

RE: [gmx-users] make_edi, g_covar -nofit

2010-05-04 Thread vijaya subramanian
Hi Carsten A couple of quick questions: I already have gromacs-4.0.7 downloaded from the gromacs website. I found that I couldn't use git checkout --track -b release-4-0-patches origin/release-4-0-patches to get the patches. fatal: Not a git repository Do I have to uninstall gromacs-4.0.7

Re: [gmx-users] make_edi, g_covar -nofit

2010-05-04 Thread Mark Abraham
On 5/05/2010 6:56 AM, vijaya subramanian wrote: Hi Carsten A couple of quick questions: I already have gromacs-4.0.7 downloaded from the gromacs website. I found that I couldn't use git checkout --track -b release-4-0-patches origin/release-4-0-patches to get the patches. fatal: Not a git

[gmx-users] Hydrogen Bond Residence Time

2010-05-04 Thread Anirban Ghosh
Hi ALL, How can I obtain the residence time of each hydrogen bond during a simulation? I think the -hbn and -hbm options of g_hbond has to be used, but how? Is there any script to extract that data? And what is the difference between the residence time and the life time of a hydrogen bond? Any