Re: [gmx-users] ERRORS IN PROTEIN-LIGAND COMPLEX SIMULATION

2011-11-16 Thread sai nitin
Hi, You can try swissparam online tool to generate protein and ligand topologies.. Cheers, Nitin On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:03 AM, arun kumar arunjones.kuma...@gmail.comwrote: hi justin, as u said i understand that there is inconsistency in the charges and charge groups of PRODRG server

Re: [gmx-users] RMSD

2011-11-16 Thread shahid nayeem
Thanks. But in timeline plugin of VMD I am able to measure RMSD with respect to one of the frame of trajectory and I am interested to measure RMSD with respect to another molecule. I am trying to measure RMSD of trajectory frames with respect to Bound and unbound configuration of molecule so that

Re: [gmx-users] ERRORS IN PROTEIN-LIGAND COMPLEX SIMULATION

2011-11-16 Thread sai nitin
Hi arun, You can try swissparam online tool to generate protein and ligand topologies.. Cheers, Nitin -- Sainitin D PhD student Bioinformatics Group Biotechnology Center Technische Universität Dresden Tatzberg 47/49 01307 Dresden, Germany Tel Lab:+49 (0)351 463 40060 -- gmx-users mailing

[gmx-users] Umbrella Sampling - Justin tutorial

2011-11-16 Thread Steven Neumann
Hi GMX Users, I am doing Justin tutorial of Umbrella sampling. I have just finished continous pulling of chainA from the reference chainB. I have some questions. I looked at the trajectory of pulling and it has began with dissociating residue 27Alanine from the ChainB following 26, 25, 24...1. My

Re: [gmx-users] ERRORS IN PROTEIN-LIGAND COMPLEX SIMULATION

2011-11-16 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Please do not include the entire digest in your post. The archive becomes hopelessly confusing when this happens... arun kumar wrote: hi justin, as u said i understand that there is inconsistency in the charges and charge groups of PRODRG server itself. can u suggest me any other

Re: [gmx-users] Pressure change after NPT equilibriation

2011-11-16 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
shilpa yadahalli wrote: Dear Justin, sorry to trouble you again. I want to ask one more thing. I saw some of the documentation regarding, and i found that (on d page u mentioned frm gromacs), for a box of 216 waters, fluctuations of 500-600 bar are standard. And for a system of 21600 water

[gmx-users] pulling force vs free energy

2011-11-16 Thread Vijayaraj
Hi, What is the relation between pulling force and free energy of binding. can we relate the maximum pulling force with the free energy. for example, 2 systems has the maximum pulling force and free energy as below from umbrella sampling and g_wham analysis, max. force

Re: [gmx-users] pulling force vs free energy

2011-11-16 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Vijayaraj wrote: Hi, What is the relation between pulling force and free energy of binding. can we relate the maximum pulling force with the free energy. for example, 2 systems has the maximum pulling force and free energy as below from umbrella sampling and g_wham analysis,

Re: [gmx-users] Umbrella Sampling - Justin tutorial

2011-11-16 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Steven Neumann wrote: Hi GMX Users, I am doing Justin tutorial of Umbrella sampling. I have just finished continous pulling of chainA from the reference chainB. I have some questions. I looked at the trajectory of pulling and it has began with dissociating residue 27Alanine from the

Re: [gmx-users] Umbrella Sampling - Justin tutorial

2011-11-16 Thread Steven Neumann
Thank you Justin, now I get what you mean! As I understood I should pick just one frame untill 189 ps (when dissociation occured) - does it matter which one I will choose on the final binding free energy? Then spacing should be 0.2 nm. Right? But how is it possible to do spacing like this from

Re: [gmx-users] Umbrella Sampling - Justin tutorial

2011-11-16 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Steven Neumann wrote: Thank you Justin, now I get what you mean! As I understood I should pick just one frame untill 189 ps (when dissociation occured) - does it matter which one I will choose on the final binding free energy? The free energy minimum should (theoretically) be when the

Re: [gmx-users] Umbrella Sampling - Justin tutorial

2011-11-16 Thread Steven Neumann
Thank you Justin! That helped a lot! Steven On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: Steven Neumann wrote: Thank you Justin, now I get what you mean! As I understood I should pick just one frame untill 189 ps (when dissociation occured) - does it matter

[gmx-users] pulling force vs free energy

2011-11-16 Thread Vijayaraj
Message: 4 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:34:02 -0500 From: Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pulling force vs free energy To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org Message-ID: 4ec3c9da.7040...@vt.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;

Re: [gmx-users] pulling force vs free energy

2011-11-16 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Vijayaraj wrote: Message: 4 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:34:02 -0500 From: Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu mailto:jalem...@vt.edu Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pulling force vs free energy To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org

[gmx-users] calculate potentials of structure

2011-11-16 Thread Liu, Liang
Dear all, I am wondering if there is a way to calculate the potential of a given RNA structure? No minimization, no simulation, but calculate the potential. -- Best, Liang Liu -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search

Re: [gmx-users] pulling force vs free energy

2011-11-16 Thread Sai Kumar Ramadugu
I agree with Justin. I have tried myself several SMD simulations for ligand binding studies. I tried 500 simulations and not sure if they are enough. Further, the path dependence is very important part. For different paths that you can try, look at McCammon group's paper in JACS 128, 3019-3026.

Re: [gmx-users] calculate potentials of structure

2011-11-16 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Liu, Liang wrote: Dear all, I am wondering if there is a way to calculate the potential of a given RNA structure? No minimization, no simulation, but calculate the potential. You can do a single-point energy evaluation with the md integrator and nsteps set to 0. -Justin --

[gmx-users] MDRun -append error

2011-11-16 Thread xianqiang
Hi, all I just restart a simulation with 'mpirun -np 8 mdrun -pd yes -s md_0_1.tpr -cpi state.cpt -append' However, the following error appears: Output file appending has been requested, but some output files listed in the checkpoint file state.cpt are not present or are named differently by

[gmx-users] *** Extended deadline Dec 6 *** CfP: 2nd Workshop on Model-driven Approaches for Simulation Engineering (Mod4Sim), in Symposium on Theory of Modeling and Simulation, SCS Spring Sim 2012

2011-11-16 Thread Daniele Gianni
*** Deadline Extended to December 6, 2011 *** ** Please submit your abstract before November 25, 2011 * #                         CALL FOR PAPERS                   2nd International Workshop

[gmx-users] Re: Restarting a crashed run

2011-11-16 Thread bharat gupta
Hi, I was running a simulation of 10ns which crashed in between at 1.7 ns due to power failure. I used the following command to restart the simulation form that point: mdrun -s topol.tpr -cpi state.cpt -append After checking the file md_0_1.log and others , I am getting data only for those

Re: [gmx-users] MDRun -append error

2011-11-16 Thread Roland Schulz
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:11 PM, xianqiang xianqiang...@126.com wrote: Hi, all I just restart a simulation with 'mpirun -np 8 mdrun -pd yes -s md_0_1.tpr -cpi state.cpt -append' However, the following error appears: Output file appending has been requested, but some output files

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Restarting a crashed run

2011-11-16 Thread Roland Schulz
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:57 PM, bharat gupta bharat.85.m...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I was running a simulation of 10ns which crashed in between at 1.7 ns due to power failure. I used the following command to restart the simulation form that point: mdrun -s topol.tpr -cpi state.cpt -append

[gmx-users] H bonds

2011-11-16 Thread larif sofiene
Greeting i looking for residues forming Hydrogen bonds with one residue,i can't get that. When using -hbm i get an xpm file that contain existence of hbond over time without any indication about who's the other residues.(it is just binary existence) is there a way to get residues engaged in the

Re: [gmx-users] H bonds

2011-11-16 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
larif sofiene wrote: Greeting i looking for residues forming Hydrogen bonds with one residue,i can't get that. Have you tried using an index group that specifies the residue of interest? When using -hbm i get an xpm file that contain existence of hbond over time without any indication

Re: [gmx-users] H bonds

2011-11-16 Thread Gianluca Santoni
Greeting i looking for residues forming Hydrogen bonds with one residue,i can't get that. When using -hbm i get an xpm file that contain existence of hbond over time without any indication about who's the other residues.(it is just binary existence) You can check the bonds index created by

[gmx-users] Fwd: Restarting a crashed run

2011-11-16 Thread bharat gupta
Hi, I was running a simulation of 10ns which crashed in between at 1.7 ns due to power failure. I used the following command to restart the simulation form that point: mdrun -s topol.tpr -cpi state.cpt -append After checking the file md_0_1.log and others , I am getting data only for those

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Re: Positive potential energy for TFE solvent

2011-11-16 Thread Mark Abraham
On 16/11/2011 5:02 PM, Harpreet Basra wrote: Hi Mark, Sorry my last mail was incomplete...here is the complete one! On 16/11/2011 1:18 AM, Harpreet Basra wrote: Hi Mark, Thanks for the quick reply. But i have already done what u suggested. On

Re: [gmx-users] import force field

2011-11-16 Thread Mark Abraham
On 16/11/2011 5:00 AM, Liu, Liang wrote: The tabulated potentials I am using is non-bonded interactions. The question is the application of these potentials will only modify the force field, e.g. amber03, or will take place of the force field? The force field is more than the non-bonded