[gmx-users] g_confrms

2012-09-16 Thread Ankita naithani
Hi, I am trying to use g_confrms to compare my initial and final structure and fit them on their backbone. However, I notice a difference of 10 atoms in both of these structures and so I am unable to use g_confrms. Can anyone please help me and advice me regarding this as the manual does mention

Re: [gmx-users] g_confrms

2012-09-16 Thread Mark Abraham
On 16/09/2012 11:49 PM, Ankita naithani wrote: Hi, I am trying to use g_confrms to compare my initial and final structure and fit them on their backbone. However, I notice a difference of 10 atoms in both of these structures and so I am unable to use g_confrms. Can anyone please help me and

Re: [gmx-users] g_confrms

2012-09-16 Thread Ankita naithani
Hi Mark, I haven't been able to figure out the reason of the difference between the two structures. When I prompt for my backbone to be fitted against each other, the initial structure has 2965 elements and the final output file has 2955 elements. Could you please suggest the possible reason for

Re: [gmx-users] g_confrms

2012-09-16 Thread Mark Abraham
On 17/09/2012 12:10 AM, Ankita naithani wrote: Hi Mark, I haven't been able to figure out the reason of the difference between the two structures. When I prompt for my backbone to be fitted against each other, the initial structure has 2965 elements and the final output file has 2955 elements.

Re: RE: [gmx-users] energy minimisation of carbon nanotubes.

2012-09-16 Thread Marcelo Depolo
I recommend use the double precision just to check the better result to your system. In my case, i've got much better results using emtol=0.004 and double precision. My system is too much unstable and i tried. I have no regrets... Marcelo Depolo Em 15/09/2012 22:11, Elie M

[gmx-users] lipid-protein simulation

2012-09-16 Thread Shima Arasteh
Dear all, To simulate a lipid-protein system, I'm using CHARMM36 FF and popc lipid bilayer. So I need to put popc.pdb, popc.itp and lipid.itp files in my working directory.  I'm wondering:  1.if it is correct to use popc.itp generated from 50 ns-simulated popc in water? 2. I need to have

Re: [gmx-users] lipid-protein simulation

2012-09-16 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 9/16/12 12:34 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: Dear all, To simulate a lipid-protein system, I'm using CHARMM36 FF and popc lipid bilayer. So I need to put popc.pdb, popc.itp and lipid.itp files in my working directory. I'm wondering: 1.if it is correct to use popc.itp generated from 50

Re: [gmx-users] lipid-protein simulation

2012-09-16 Thread Shima Arasteh
Thanks. Yes, I want to use the coordinate file from 50-ns simulation.  Would you please let me know what the criterion for knowing that the equilibrated system is proper for insertion of protein? Do the temperature, RMSD, pressure and visualization of popc-water system make me decide that it

Re: [gmx-users] lipid-protein simulation

2012-09-16 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 9/16/12 12:48 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: Thanks. Yes, I want to use the coordinate file from 50-ns simulation. Would you please let me know what the criterion for knowing that the equilibrated system is proper for insertion of protein? Do the temperature, RMSD, pressure and visualization

[gmx-users] About topology construction for yclic pepetide

2012-09-16 Thread vidhya sankar
Dear Mark ,   Again    Thanks  for you reply After Editing my pdb  file from intial FL to FLF format  Then i Run pdb2gmx for my linaer    pdb  file , i have selected none for both termini ( with -ter option) as you mailed me in the previous mail I have got error as

Re: [gmx-users] About topology construction for yclic pepetide

2012-09-16 Thread Mark Abraham
On 17/09/2012 2:55 AM, vidhya sankar wrote: Dear Mark , AgainThanks for you reply After Editing my pdb file from intial FL to FLF format Then i Run pdb2gmx for my linaerpdb file , i have selected none for both termini ( with -ter option) as you mailed

[gmx-users] About topology construction for Cyclic peptide

2012-09-16 Thread vidhya sankar
Dear Mark,   Thank you for your reply I have used the peptide  FLF For that  pdb2gmx construct topology successfully with -ter  choosing any thing  for both terminal. But When i Choose none with -ter for both terminal It  again shows error as follows Fatal error: There

[gmx-users] Topology and mdp file for coupling vdw and coulombic interactions for running FE calculations using BAR

2012-09-16 Thread Sonia Milena Aguilera Segura
Hi, I'm preparing my mdp and topology files for running free energy calculations using BAR method. I´m using Justin Lemkul's tutorial as a reference (You can find it here http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/free_energy/08_advanced.html). According to this

[gmx-users] Regarding Pulling simulation:To study the base flipping of the thymine

2012-09-16 Thread bipin singh
Hi all, I am studying a system which consists of DNA duplex 20 base pairs. Actually I am interested in studying the base flipping of the thymine. I have the crystal structure of extrahelical DNA in which thymine is out side the helical structure. I want use pulling simulations to bring this base