This could be helpful, I hope.
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/File_Formats/FF.dat?highlight=change+ff+list
Dra.M.Florencia Martini
Cátedra de Farmacotecnia II
Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Junín 956 6º (1113)
TE: 54 011 4964-8273
The values are OK, you obtain a value of RMSD of 0.2510229 . The value -1
refers time, and it is because you do not have a trajectory. You are comparing
only two .pdb structures, so it is consistent that you obtain only one value,
as you do not have more than one frame to compare.
Regards
Flor
You should try packmol software. You will need to use a pdb formats, but then
you transform to .gro with pdb2gmx. It´s free and very easy to use.
http://www.ime.unicamp.br/~martinez/packmol/
Flor
Dra.M.Florencia Martini
Cátedra de Farmacotecnia II
Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica
Perhaps you can do your parametrization. Enter to the prodrg page and you will
see!
The page is:
http://davapc1.bioch.dundee.ac.uk/prodrg/
and you will get your .gro and .top, and you don't need to use the pdb2gmx. If
you want to use it anyway, you need to edit the data base, but I think that
is your performance on a single node (4 CPUs)? You could compare that to
the performance of 4 CPUs on 2 nodes to determine the networkimpact.
Carsten
On Sep 24, 2009, at 5:08 PM, FLOR MARTINI wrote:
Thanks for your question.
We are running a lipid bilayer of 128 DPPC and 3655 water molecules
hi,
We are about to start running GROMACS 4.0.4 with OpenMPI, in 8
nodes, quad core Rocks cluster. We made some tests, without PME and
found two notable things:
* We are getting the best speedup (6) with 2 nodes ( == 8 cores ). I read
the Speeding Up Parallel GROMACS in High Latency networks
Thanks for your question.
We are running a lipid bilayer of 128 DPPC and 3655 water molecules and the
nstep of the mdp is a total for 10 ns. I don´t think really that our system is
a small one...
Dra.M.Florencia Martini
Laboratorio de Fisicoquímica de Membranas Lipídicas y Liposomas
Cátedra
7 matches
Mail list logo