,
Shuangxing Dai
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Vitaly Chaban vvcha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there an option in any gromacs utility to apply periodicity to the
output configuration or trajectory? I want to get all the coordinates
just within an elementary box, between 0 and LBOX in spite of any
. Does anyone
have idea how to solve this?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Shuangxing Dai
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe
information. When I change and use
Berendson for pressure coupling, there is error information and does not
work.
Anyone have idea about these? Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Shuangxing Dai
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please
Thanks for the help.
The error information is: Using Berendsen pressure coupling invalidates the
true ensemble for the thermostat.
Do you have any idea of this information?
Thanks,
Shuangxing Dai
On Jul 12, 2010, at 15:43, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
Shuangxing Dai wrote:
Hi
0.01 1.03E+00 2.12E+00 9.95E-03 1.21E-04
100 5.48359 71.5565 91.198 1.25218 300 2.62807 162.926 290.324 3.36594 500
16.6356 1048.76 492.616 5.45231 800 59.3245 594.773 799.314 9.18876 1000
80.2257 626.789 1007.23 11.2159
Thanks in advance,
Shuangxing Dai
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Shuangxing Dai wrote:
Hi, all,
I am trying to do anisotropic coupling using Parrinello-Rahman. I
want to reach the equilibrium state at 1000K, 0.1MPa( 1 bar). However,
I find that the fluctuation is so large ( p=80.22 bar, T=1007.23 K
= 1e-4
ewald_geometry = 3d
epsilon_surface = 0
optimize_fft = no
It seems that the temperature coupling is fast and fluctuation is less that
1%. But the pressure coupling fails. The pressure fluctuates from +1e3 bar
to -1e3 bar. Anyone can help?
Thanks,
Shuangxing
mean if the initial pressure ( in order of GPa),
object pressure is 1 bar ( 1e5 Pa).
*
*
Thanks,
Shuangxing Dai
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:50 PM, gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org wrote:
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:18:14 -0400
From: Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu
Subject: Re: [gmx
in advance.
Thanks,
Shuangxing Dai
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send
= 1e-4
ewald_geometry = 3d
epsilon_surface = 0
optimize_fft = no
Can anyone help me? Thank you in advance.
Thanks,
Shuangxing Dai
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http
%5BAuthor%5D
.
The performance there is around 1 ps/day. I do not understand why my
speed is so slow and it seems that Ewald option makes it slow.
Thanks,
Shuangxing Dai
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:18 AM, gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org wrote:
Send gmx-users mailing list submissions to
gmx
,
Shuangxing Dai
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ
Dear all,
--
Shuangxing Dai
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests
need
the breakpoints to be related with the source code so that I can trace
the flow.
Sorry for the last mail that I pressed space accidently...
Thank you in advance.
--
Shuangxing Dai
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http
Dear all,
I was wondering how to debug the executable file mdrun in Xcode. Right now I
can debug it using gdb by following here:
http://oldwiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Programmer's_Guide
But I do not know how to debug it by Xcode. For example, I want to debug this
command:
mdrun -c steep.g96
Hi, all,
I was wondering why I got large pressure after energy minimization. In MD,
the pressure and pressure tensor is defined like ( equation 4.151 in manual):
P=2*(E_kinetic + W)/(3*V), V is volume and W is Virial.
I run a simple system, fcc gold with LJ potential to
in advance.
--
Shuangxing Dai
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests
Yes, I did one md step and got all non-zero forces.
But for the energy minimization, all the forces are zero, althouth mdrun
command gives non-zero forces.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Florian Dommert
domm...@icp.uni-stuttgart.de wrote:
* Shuangxing Dai shuangxing...@gmail.com [2009-06-27
Hi, all,
I was wondering about the force given by Gromacs. One is in the .trr and
.tpr file. When I read then with gmxdump, they are all zeros:
traj.trr frame 0:
natoms= 24000 step= 0 time=0.000e+00 lambda= 0
box (3x3):
box[0]={ 3.24900e+00,
The nstfout =1 in mdout.mdp. So this should not be where the problem is.
- Original Message -
From: Florian Dommert domm...@icp.uni-stuttgart.de
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2009 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] force
atom at
each step? Just like it did to the forces? I use this mdp file and only see
the total energy for each step in the log file.
Thanks again.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Florian Dommert
domm...@icp.uni-stuttgart.de wrote:
* Shuangxing Dai shuangxing...@gmail.com [2009-06-27 18:57:41
Hi, all,
I need more digits to input information. But the default format of pdb file
for coordinate is %8.3f. Can I modify the pdbio.c file to achive this goal? Or
is there any other direct ways to input more digits coordinate information in
Gromacs?
Thanks in advance.
Shuangxing
Hi, all,
I was wondering to modify Shift electrostatic summation to a new one. The
origin Shift form in Gromacs is like 1/r-1/Rc (Rc is cut-off), I need to modify
to erfc(alpha*r)/r-erfc(alpha*Rc)/Rc, and the original long-range correction of
Shift in code shift_util.c is q^2/(2*Rc) (
in force.c since there is no formula for force found. Or I
find the wrong place? And if I want to modify the force formula for Shift,
where is it?
Thank you for your help.
Shuangxing Dai
- Original Message -
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx
- Original Message -
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: 14 April, 2009 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Shift Electrostatic Summation
Shuangxing Dai wrote:
Thank you for your help. Yes, when I found the user
Hi, all,
I am doing shell molecular dynamics and I have read the sw.itp. Now my
question is:
1. For the shell atom, what element should be used in .pdb file, since the
77-78th digits of pdb file is element symbol ?
2. What does the 1 in [ polarization ] part mean in sw.itp?
3. Is it
is
the problem.
Shuangxing Dai
- Original Message -
From: David van der Spoel sp...@xray.bmc.uu.se
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: 13 April, 2009 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] shell molecular dynamics
Shuangxing Dai wrote:
Hi, all,
I am doing
for your kindly help.
Shuangxing Dai
- Original Message -
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: 26 March, 2009 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] How to add another electrostatic summation methodin
Gromacs
- Original Message -
From: Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: 27 March, 2009 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] How to add another electrostatic summation
methodinGromacs
Shuangxing Dai wrote:
Yes, but I still
this
Wolf method can, so I cannot simply use Gromacs to do my simulation. The
question is which files needed to be modified if I want to add a new one? Is
there any direct way? Or I should read all the whole code?
Thank you very much.
Shuangxing Dai
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Mark Abraham
Hi, all,
I was wondering how to add another electrostatic summation method--Wolf
summation into Gromacs. Wolf summation is a treatment for summation of
Coulombic energy. Since the formula of total potential energy for each ion is
known, how to add this into Gromacs? According to Chapter 7,
aboutthecombinationrules
Shuangxing Dai wrote:
Yes, add parameters for crystalline zinc oxide, which require
Buckingham nonbonded interactions, that is what I am doing. I think I
have changed all the necessary parts for the Buckingham potential. Is
there any direct way to accomplish my goal
Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
Shuangxing Dai wrote:
No. I only changed 3 lines in ffgmxnb.itp. But there are hundreds of lines
of error informaion like this:
ERROR 77 [file ffgmxnb.itp, line 144]:
Trying to add LJ (SR) while the default nonbond type is Buck.ham (SR)
Sure
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] combination rules -- the part aboutthe
combinationrules
Shuangxing Dai wrote:
Thanks for your answer. I changed the non-bond parameters in ffgmxnb.itp.
like
; ij func abc6
Zn O2
@gromacs.org
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] combination rules -- the part aboutthe
combinationrules
Shuangxing Dai wrote:
Thanks for your answer. I changed the non-bond parameters in
ffgmxnb.itp.
like
; i j func a b c6
Zn O 2
Thanks for your answer. I changed the non-bond parameters in ffgmxnb.itp. like
; ij func abc6
Zn O2 ... .
But error occured..
ERROR 1 [file ffgmxnb.itp, line 270]:
Trying to add Buck.ham (SR) while the default nonbond type is LJ (SR)
Hello,
I was wondering how to set up parameters for interactions between two
different atoms A and B. Since for Gromacs parameters are defined to each kind
of atom, I cannot specify parameters between A and B. For Buckingham potential,
the rule was:
A_ij=(A_ii * A_jj)^(1/2)
So anyone
Hi, all gmx users:
I am doing a simulation with NaCl (and ZnO, GaN). I start with the .pdb
file. But the Gromacs cannot recognize my new atom, such as Na, Cl. How to add
new atoms to Gromacs?
I am going to use periodical boundary conditions and LJ potential, shell
model , apply
38 matches
Mail list logo