Re: [gmx-users] Announcement: Large biomolecule benchmark report

2012-03-16 Thread Hannes Loeffler
Thanks a a lot to you and also to Szilárd for your feedback and encouragement. I am very happy to see that this work is indeed useful especially to developers. We have no plans to make this into a 'proper' publication. I am not sure how much interested the simulation community would be because,

[gmx-users] Announcement: Large biomolecule benchmark report

2012-03-16 Thread chris . neale
You should absolutely publish this. it would be of great interest. You can mitigate your chances of running into problems with the overview by sending a version of the manuscript to the developers of each software and asking them to provide a short paragraph, each of which you could

[gmx-users] Announcement: Large biomolecule benchmark report

2012-03-15 Thread Hannes Loeffler
Dear all, we proudly announce our third benchmarking report on (large) biomolecular systems carried out on various HPC platforms. We have expanded our repertoire to five MD codes (AMBER, CHARMM, GROMACS, LAMMPS and NAMD) and to five protein and protein-membrane systems ranging from 20 thousand

Re: [gmx-users] Announcement: Large biomolecule benchmark report

2012-03-15 Thread David van der Spoel
On 2012-03-15 14:37, Hannes Loeffler wrote: Dear all, we proudly announce our third benchmarking report on (large) biomolecular systems carried out on various HPC platforms. We have expanded our repertoire to five MD codes (AMBER, CHARMM, GROMACS, LAMMPS and NAMD) and to five protein and

Re: [gmx-users] Announcement: Large biomolecule benchmark report

2012-03-15 Thread Szilárd Páll
I fully agree with David, it's great to have independent benchmarks! In fact, already the the previous version of the report has been of great use for us, we have referred to the results in a few occasions. -- Szilárd On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Hannes Loeffler hannes.loeff...@stfc.ac.uk