On 7/12/2011 7:41 PM, lloyd riggs wrote:
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0100
From: Javier Cerezo
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] RE: logfile size
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Message-ID:<4ede57da.80...@um.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Not th
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:58:50 +0100
From: Javier Cerezo
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] RE: logfile size
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Message-ID: <4ede57da.80...@um.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Not the main problem, but your dt=0.0002 (0.2fs),
Not the main problem, but your dt=0.0002 (0.2fs), is it what you want?
Javier
El 06/12/11 15:59, Mark Abraham escribió:
On 7/12/2011 12:12 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
On 6/12/2011 8:48 PM, lloyd riggs wrote:
Dear All,
Hope this is not tooo stupid a question. I recenttly reduced my
file sizes b
On 7/12/2011 12:12 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
On 6/12/2011 8:48 PM, lloyd riggs wrote:
Dear All,
Hope this is not tooo stupid a question. I recenttly reduced my file
sizes by increasing the time between writing. However, if I do an
Umbrella run I get the following to my logfile output, which m
On 6/12/2011 8:48 PM, lloyd riggs wrote:
Dear All,
Hope this is not tooo stupid a question. I recenttly reduced my file sizes by
increasing the time between writing. However, if I do an Umbrella run I get
the following to my logfile output, which makes my log file in the end larger
than my
Dear All,
Hope this is not tooo stupid a question. I recenttly reduced my file sizes by
increasing the time between writing. However, if I do an Umbrella run I get
the following to my logfile output, which makes my log file in the end larger
than my trajectory;
Dispersion correction
6 matches
Mail list logo
