Re: [gmx-users] RMSD with Vsite vs No Vsites

2011-05-06 Thread Mark Abraham
On 6/05/2011 2:21 AM, Sikandar Mashayak wrote: Hi As a test case, I did two simulations one the usual Protein in Water and other with Vsites at COM of each monomer but these Vsites dont interact with anyone else. I was expecting results of these two should match almost exactly, but when I

Re: [gmx-users] RMSD with Vsite vs No Vsites

2011-05-06 Thread Peter C. Lai
On 2011-05-05 11:21:54AM -0500, Sikandar Mashayak wrote: Hi As a test case, I did two simulations one the usual Protein in Water and other with Vsites at COM of each monomer but these Vsites dont interact with anyone else. I was expecting results of these two should match almost exactly,

Re: [gmx-users] RMSD with Vsite vs No Vsites

2011-05-06 Thread Sikandar Mashayak
well the deviations are about more than 0.5 nm.. On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Peter C. Lai p...@uab.edu wrote: On 2011-05-05 11:21:54AM -0500, Sikandar Mashayak wrote: Hi As a test case, I did two simulations one the usual Protein in Water and other with Vsites at COM of each monomer

Re: [gmx-users] RMSD with Vsite vs No Vsites

2011-05-06 Thread Mark Abraham
On 6/05/2011 5:32 PM, Sikandar Mashayak wrote: well the deviations are about more than 0.5 nm.. And what does gmxcheck -s1 -s2 show? Mark On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Peter C. Lai p...@uab.edu mailto:p...@uab.edu wrote: On 2011-05-05 11:21:54AM -0500, Sikandar Mashayak wrote:

[gmx-users] RMSD with Vsite vs No Vsites

2011-05-05 Thread Sikandar Mashayak
Hi As a test case, I did two simulations one the usual Protein in Water and other with Vsites at COM of each monomer but these Vsites dont interact with anyone else. I was expecting results of these two should match almost exactly, but when I compare the rmsd for Protein there seems to be