[gmx-users] Re: Wierd results from Umbrella sampling

2012-05-23 Thread Thomas Schlesier
potential (let's say 3000, ok?) and dt=2 ft, which value is definitely not recommended by Martini developers. With Regards, Jiangfeng. Message: 3 Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 18:53:54 +0200 From: Thomas Schlesierschl...@uni-mainz.de Subject: [gmx-users] Re: Wierd results from Umbrella sampling, (Justin

[gmx-users] Re: Wierd results from Umbrella, sampling (Justin A. Lemkul)

2012-05-22 Thread Thomas Schlesier
Think it would be best to show the .mdp file, else we can only guess what the parameters are. From the histogram it looks like that the force constant of the restraining potential is too low, since the histograms are really wide, but pull_k1=1000 is a 'normal' value. On thing which confueses me

[gmx-users] Re: Wierd results from Umbrella sampling, (Justin A. Lemkul)

2012-05-22 Thread Thomas Schlesier
. Message: 3 Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 16:36:47 +0200 From: Thomas Schlesierschl...@uni-mainz.de Subject: [gmx-users] Re: Wierd results from Umbrella, sampling (Justin A. Lemkul) To:gmx-users@gromacs.org Message-ID:4fbba47f.5010...@uni-mainz.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Wierd results from Umbrella sampling, (Justin A. Lemkul)

2012-05-22 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
. With Regards, Jiangfeng. Message: 3 Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 16:36:47 +0200 From: Thomas Schlesierschl...@uni-mainz.de Subject: [gmx-users] Re: Wierd results from Umbrella, sampling (Justin A. Lemkul) To:gmx-users@gromacs.org Message-ID:4fbba47f.5010...@uni-mainz.de Content-Type: text/plain