[gmx-users] Re: v-rescale

2012-09-21 Thread Ladasky
Peter C. Lai wrote Generally it's probably not a good idea to rely on tutorials designed around 3.3 when a google search for gromacs tutorial shows a series of 4.5.x tutorials written by Justin himself, with explanations of why certain steps are conducted. (also when certain features may

[gmx-users] Re: v-rescale

2012-09-20 Thread Ladasky
Hi Peter, Thanks for your response. Rather than dragging this thread too far off-topic, I'll direct you back to my thread, where I have just posted additional details. I took a warning message from GROMACS a bit too literally and it caused me to use conditions that blew up my simulations. I am

Re: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale

2012-09-20 Thread Peter C. Lai
On 2012-09-20 12:18:02AM -0700, Ladasky wrote: Hi Peter, Thanks for your response. Rather than dragging this thread too far off-topic, I'll direct you back to my thread, where I have just posted additional details. I took a warning message from GROMACS a bit too literally and it caused

Re: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale

2012-09-20 Thread ms
On 20/09/12 01:35, Peter C. Lai wrote: then switching to nose-hoover for production runs (as nose-hoover chains result in the correct canonical distribution)? I was under the impression that v-rescale resulted in the correct canonical distribution as well. Is this incorrect? -- Massimo

Re: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale

2012-09-20 Thread Mark Abraham
On 20/09/2012 9:35 AM, Peter C. Lai wrote: I am not sure where the idea of using berendsen barostat with the v-rescale thermostat for equilibration came from, however. Doesn't the typical equilibration begin with v-rescale for temperature equilibration then adding parinello-rahman barostat then

Re: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Shirts
I've done some extensive testing (paper on testing method in the works) and vrescale gives a very accurate ensemble very well for NVT. Parrinello-Rahman and MTTK are the only algorithms that are correct for NPT. Berendsen barostat is not. Note that there is a bug with vrescale + md-vv + that is

[gmx-users] Re: v-rescale

2012-09-19 Thread Ladasky
Dear Sara, I just had a problem with my simulations that I traced to the use of the V-rescale temperature algorithm. Here is my recent post: http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/Re-Water-molecules-cannot-be-settled-why-td4999302.html;cid=1348087067061-71#a5001121 V-rescale may be appropriate in

Re: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale

2012-09-19 Thread Peter C. Lai
I am not sure where the idea of using berendsen barostat with the v-rescale thermostat for equilibration came from, however. Doesn't the typical equilibration begin with v-rescale for temperature equilibration then adding parinello-rahman barostat then switching to nose-hoover for production

[gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic oscillator

2009-05-12 Thread Giovanni Bussi
Dear Servaas, the problem that you found is not related to the stochastic rescaling itself, but to the way the effective energy is calculated in gromacs. In particular, the increment in the integral part is not consistent with the applied scaling. You can correct for this by changing

[gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic oscillator

2009-05-12 Thread servaas
am prepared to help with it or test it if this is required. Kind regards, Servaas - Message: 1 Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:06:52 +0200 From: Giovanni Bussi giovanni.bu...@gmail.com Subject: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic oscillator To: gmx-users@gromacs.org

RE: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic oscillator

2009-05-12 Thread Berk Hess
...@student.kuleuven.be To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:25:02 +0200 Subject: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic oscillator Dear Dr. Bussi, Thank you very much for the explanation of this problem. So I understand that a problem remains with the integrator used

RE: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic oscillator

2009-05-08 Thread Berk Hess
will probably not fix this for 4.0.5, but only for 4.1, so we do not change the reproducibility in minor revisions. Berk From: servaas.michielss...@student.kuleuven.be To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 15:27:37 +0200 Subject: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic oscillator Hi Berk

[gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic oscillator

2009-05-08 Thread servaas
: Berk Hess g...@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic oscillator To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org Message-ID: col113-w10f68330ea113929cbc3518e...@phx.gbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi, I have come to the conclusion

RE: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic oscillator

2009-05-08 Thread Berk Hess
@gromacs.org Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 11:17:33 +0200 Subject: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic oscillator Hi, Thanks for your confirmation of this problem. One thing is not clear to me from your answer. Has v-rescale fundamental problems with a Harmonic oscillator or is it a problem

RE: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic oscillator

2009-05-07 Thread Berk Hess
Hi, No, only for small values is should be off, maybe tau_t 10 or 100 * delta_t. How did you set up your harmonic oscillator? Berk From: servaas.michielss...@student.kuleuven.be To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:54:54 +0200 Subject: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic

[gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic oscillator

2009-05-07 Thread servaas
oscillator? Berk From: servaas.michielss...@student.kuleuven.be To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:54:54 +0200 Subject: [gmx-users] Re: v-rescale - harmonic oscillator Hi, Thank you for your reply. Yes by effective energy I mean