Re: [gmx-users] rvdw and dispersion correction for amber99sb

2012-08-20 Thread Mark Abraham
On 21/08/2012 2:30 PM, Yun Shi wrote: Hello all, I am simulating protein-ligand complex with amber99sb force field in TIP3P water. What would be a reasonable value rvdw? I saw someone uses 1.0, and I did not find any abnormality when using 1.4 nm for rvdw, but where can I find the right

Re: [gmx-users] rvdw and dispersion correction for amber99sb

2012-08-20 Thread Yun Shi
In the original paper [Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters], 0.8 nm was used; but I did find recent papers using 1.0 nm for rvdw. And I myself used 1.4 nm, all without obvious abnormality. On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Mark Abraham